Latest News on Forensic Science and Criminal Law
-
Join 223 other subscribers
Author Archives: csidds
The sometimes nasty world of forensic experts in the US
Here are 3 blogs created by David Averiil from Bitemarks.org which are about how some people will admit that justice eventually must be recognized, even after their fighting at-all-costs-to-win or maintain a conviction. In this instance, its the District Attorneys’ office in … Continue reading
Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform, Ray Krone bitemark case, wrongful convictions
Tagged Bad forensic science, Exculpatory Evidence, Forensic science, forensic testimony, Miscarriage of justice, wrongful convictions
Leave a comment
Forensics: 2004 Chi Trib articles about dubious bitemark convictions and bad science that still stand as “justice done.”
Originally posted on FORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends:
Its been 11 years since this article was published. Its about the DNA vs bitemark case AZ v. Tankersley. The defendant is still in prison. The “bitemark matchers” were ABFO members…
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Read why sanctions for prosecutorial misconduct are a sham | The Veritas Report
In continuing the theme of the US judicial system “healing itself,” this 19 page summary report (published in 2010 by the NorCal Innocence Project; funded by the Veritas Initiative ) on the 1997 to 2009 history of California’s feeble (actually … Continue reading
Forensics: Prosecutor and crime lab workers not immune to civil rights suit: 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Nothing much more to say, than, OMG. Everyone expects this to get moved upstream to the US Supremes. They have said “nay nay” to these lawsuits since the Connick v. Thompson SCOTUS decision. (originally from Louisiana). This plantiff is named Armstrong. … Continue reading
Posted in costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, DNA profiling, Forensic science misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct
Tagged crime labs, Criminal Justice, district attorney, DNA profiling, innocence project, Miscarriage of justice, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful convictions
Leave a comment
A California District Attorney Gets the Judicial Hammer for Misconduct
There are calls for DOJ to investigate this event. It’s a big scandal. Here is a snippet about the Orange Co Prosecutor’s trail of bad faith actions in the court system. He just got booted from a terrible mass shooting … Continue reading
Efforts to rid court system of outdated and flawed forensic “expertise”
Old Convictions, New Science Texas tackles debunked forensics. This legislative process in Texas reflects how the monolithic (i.e huge) US criminal justice system “repairs” itself. I use the word “repair” very loosely in that people have to be injured, killed … Continue reading
Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, CSI, death penalty, DNA mixtures, DNA profiling, exoneration, Exoneration costs, expert testimony, Forensic Dentistry, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform, forensic testimony, Innocence March, junk forensic science, police crime labs
Tagged AAFS, ABFO, American Academy of Forensic Science, AMERICAN BOARD OF FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY, Bad forensic science, bitemark, Bitemarks, California Innocence Project, Claim of Innocence, Criminal Justice, CSI, DNA profiling, Exculpatory Evidence, exoneration, expert witnesses, Fair Trial, falsified evidence, FBI Crime Lab, forensic dentistry, forensic examiner error, Forensic science, forensic testimony, innocence project, junk forensic science, junk science, Miscarriage of justice, misidentification, National Commission on Forensic Science, National Institute of Justice, william richards, wrongful convictions
Leave a comment
Media conference on junk forensic science
Once this meeting was over, the FBI DNA lab announced 16 years of its population stats were flawed. http://politicalnews.me/?id=33868&keys=VIOLENT-CRIMINALS-FLAWED-EVIDENCE
Forensics: What’s the world coming to? Now the FBI is saying their DNA lab calculations since 1999 are incorrect?
The tainted atmosphere surrounding forensic science in general and specifically in regards to the devastating FBI faux pas from their elite hair people is still bouncing around the media-verse. With that still happening, the FBI now says their DNA population … Continue reading
Posted in AAFS, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, CSI, DNA mixtures, DNA profiling, forensic science reform
Tagged AAFS, ABFO, American Academy of Forensic Science, AMERICAN BOARD OF FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY, Bad forensic science, bitemark, bitemark evidence, California Innocence Project, crime labs, Criminal Justice, DNA, DNA profiling, exoneration, expert witnesses, falsified evidence, FBI Crime Lab, forensic examiner error, Forensic science, forensic testimony, innocence project, junk forensic science, Miscarriage of justice, National Commission on Forensic Science, National Institute of Justice, prosecutorial misconduct, Radley Balko, wrongful convictions
Leave a comment
Testimony of an FBI hair analyst
Nothing cuts through the current hyperbole of forensic science reform debates and counter debates than reading what the “elite” of the FBI hair comparison people actually said in US courtrooms. The following is testimonial evidence from an actual case. Things … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged AAFS, ABFO, American Academy of Forensic Science, AMERICAN BOARD OF FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY, Bad forensic science, bitemark, California Innocence Project, Claim of Innocence, crime labs, Criminal Justice, CSI, district attorney, DNA profiling, Exculpatory Evidence, exoneration, expert witnesses, falsified evidence, FBI Crime Lab, forensic dentistry, forensic examiner error, Forensic science, forensic testimony, innocence project, junk forensic science, junk science, Miscarriage of justice, National Commission on Forensic Science, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful convictions
2 Comments
Forensics : Research suggests that bitemarks used to prosecute in child abuse cases have lower pattern details than those bites seen in wrongful convictions.
(updated 2:16pm 7-17-2014) Research on bitemark opinions: Bites on kids have lower pattern details than in bites used in wrongful convictions used by prosecutors. Authored by myself and Professor Iain Pretty. It was published in the Journal of Forensic Sciences … Continue reading
FORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends 