Category Archives: expert testimony

‘Forensics: Not sooth-saying? Graphology predictions. Signature and handwriting can reveal one’s personality’ | Nagpur News – Times of India

Handwriting, like nature’s law, is unique to an individual. — Read on timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/signature-and-handwriting-can-reveal-ones-personality/articleshow/85336713.cms

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct, human rights violations, junk forensic science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Forensics: Law Prof Maneka Sinha pulls no punches. What’s Wrong with Forensic Science? Everything. “Junk dressed up as scientific analysis.”

One word for this law review paper. WOW!! 👏 What’s Wrong with Forensic Science? Everything, Says Paper | The Crime Report — Read on thecrimereport.org/2021/08/11/whats-wrong-with-forensic-science-everything-says-paper/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, CSI, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: DC crime lab might not fully regain accreditation until early 2022

It could be early 2022 before the embattled D.C. crime lab regains its full accreditation to perform forensic testing, the lab’s interim director told a panel of science advisers last week. — Read on wtop.com/dc/2021/07/dc-crime-lab-might-not-fully-regain-accreditation-until-early-2022/

Posted in AAFS, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, CSI, expert testimony, Forensic crime lab security issues, forensic science misconduct, US Crime labs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensic examination: Unhappy bitemarkers in OZ. The case for a criminal review commission in Australia

Uneasy about improper use of their discipline, forensics experts call for an appeals body to protect against miscarriages of justice — Read on http://www.theguardian.com/law/2021/jul/18/forensic-examination-the-case-for-a-criminal-review-commission-in-australia

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science reform, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Low proficiency experts’ juror effects explored. Insights: Juror Appraisals of Forensic Science Evidence – @CSAFE

Insights: Juror Appraisals of Forensic Science Evidence – Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence — Read on forensicstats.org/blog/2020/10/10/insights-juror-appraisals-of-forensic-science-evidence/

Posted in AAFS, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: How a Sharp-Eyed Scientist Became Biology’s Image Detective | The New Yorker

Using just her eyes and memory, Elisabeth Bik has single-handedly identified thousands of studies containing potentially doctored scientific images. — Read on http://www.newyorker.com/science/elements/how-a-sharp-eyed-scientist-became-biologys-image-detective

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Crime lab scandal, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, US homicide statistics analysis | Leave a comment

Forensics: Exonerated Defendants Lost 25,000 Years to Wrongful Imprisonment

Exonerated Defendants Lost 25,000 Years to Wrongful Imprisonment | The Crime Report — Read on thecrimereport.org/2021/06/15/exonerated-defendants-lost-25000-years-to-wrongful-imprisonment/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, costs of wrongful convictions, exoneration, expert testimony, Forensic Dentistry, forensic science misconduct, William Richards Exoneration Case | Leave a comment

Forensics: Bayesian theory has limitations in forensic disciplines. NIST’s Hyer and Lund

phys.org/news/2017-10-nist-urges-caution-courtroom-evidence.html

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, DNA profiling, expert testimony, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, US Crime labs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: 40 hour course qualifies to do BPA. Study on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis Finds ‘Conclusions Were Often Erroneous’

Study on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis Finds ‘Conclusions Were Often Erroneous’ – Reason.com — Read on reason.com/2021/06/11/study-on-bloodstain-pattern-analysis-finds-conclusions-were-often-erroneous/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics. Scientist Faces Legal threats and police searches: Debate explodes over baby shaking science

Forensic Science progress is personally and professionally risky. Waney Squire MD had similar retribution in the UK. Legal threats and police searches: Debate explodes over baby shaking science — Read on amp.theage.com.au/national/victoria/legal-threats-and-police-searches-debate-explodes-over-baby-shaking-science-20210513-p57rkp.html

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science | Tagged , | Leave a comment