Category Archives: Bad Forensic Science

Forensics Canada: Bitemarkers run amok; Courts and DAs prefer case precedence over science.

This is a 50 page UBC Law Review narrative on the inadequacies of courts to recognize junk “forensic” experts. Battling Canadian bitemarkers leave a trail of exaggerated claims and criminal case law that is blind to scientific principles. SSRN-id3201061   … Continue reading

Posted in ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, expert testimony, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Forensics for Dummies: Some cops agree with dishonest DAs about bitemarks.

https://reason.com/reasontv/2018/05/22/stossel-junk-science-locks-up-innocent-p

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, prosecutorial misconduct, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

More judges and DAs bail on opportunity to exclude bitemarkers “identification” bogus opinions.

Who ever said science and law have a common ground of knowledge? Not in this case and others still pending with lawyers arguing guilt is proven by practitioners of their unsubstantiated offerings of “medical certainty.”   https://www.altoonamirror.com/news/local-news/2018/05/ross-bite-mark-appeal-rejected/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, junk forensic science, Wrongful Conviction | Leave a comment

Another exoneration from a bitemark conviction is pending. Court hearing next week.

John Kunco in Pennsylvania has local and Innocence Project attorneys arguing for his release on May 23. His possible exoneration could bring the number of men released from false science testimony of  bitemarkers to 31 cases. http://triblive.com/local/westmoreland/13657991-74/lawyers-say-new-dna-evidence-proves-john-kunco-innocent-of-new-kensington Backstory on Kunco.

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, exoneration, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Expose’ On Failed Bitemarker Forensics Still Certified by the AAFS

  Nothing better explains how weak this self-proclaiming Colorado Springs-based forensic org (The American Academy of Forensic Sciences) has become than this continuing look at the baseless claims of its bitemark membership. Read The Intercept interview where the authors of “The Cadaver … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, forensic fraud, forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Major US science orgs oppose Sessions cancelling of forensic science commission

The AAAS, ACS and two other groups associated with main-stream science put in their two cents about desiring “independent and transparent” review and monitoring of police forensic research and methods. This will largely prove futile. It is obvious that the … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

AAFS president DesPortes sounds off abt junk science in forensic labs

She is making clear for Science Friday that self validation of methods by police crime labs leads justice into the swamp.  Science Friday May 20, 2017

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice reform, forensic science reform protecting the innocent, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Obama Left Forensic Science Reform At the Altar

That’s according to Radley Balko at the Washington Post. He sums up the missed opportunity for the outgoing US president to push his Attorney General Lynch and the FBI’s Comey to open a proper dialogue after the PCAST report from … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, forensic misconuct, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Here’s a criminal lawyer’s worst nightmare: Hiring a forensic expert with a faked resume.

Interesting story for a few reasons: The opposing expert was a cop and thought this defense expert’s CV looked suspicious. This in itself isn’t unusual. Fact-checking an expert is a rather basic act by both sides in court cases. I’ve … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, expert testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How “professional” scientific journals become shills for the bottom dollar

  All unSound Science Deserves to Be Pun[Publ]ished PLOS ONE gives researchers a faster path to publishing in a high-quality peer-reviewed journal. All work that reaches rigorous technical and ethical standards is published and freely and immediately available to everyone. … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, forensic science misconduct | Tagged , , | Leave a comment