Category Archives: forensic evidence exaggeration

Forensics: Company says all is AOK with this. Cops Used DNA to Predict a Suspect’s Face—and Tried to Run Facial Recognition on It | WIRED

Police around the US say they’re justified to run DNA-generated 3D models of faces through facial recognition tools to help crack cold cases. Everyone but the cops thinks that’s a bad idea. — Read on http://www.wired.com/story/parabon-nanolabs-dna-face-models-police-facial-recognition/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, DNA profiling, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic science misconduct, human identification, Medical errors, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Only “New Evidence” Allows $$$. Lieing cops and DAs don’t count. Why is Michigan Failing to Compensate the Wrongly Convicted? — ProPublica

The state can provide the wrongfully convicted compensation of $50,000 for each year of incarceration, but the law’s narrow criteria and confusion over eligibility leave former prisoners facing another system that seems stacked against them. — Read on http://www.propublica.org/article/why-michigan-failing-compensate-wrongly-convicted-despite-law

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, human rights violations | Leave a comment

Forensics: A Trail of Tears. How the Junk Science of Hair Analysis Keeps People Behind Bars – Mother Jones

Each of these cases takes years to litigate and $ defendants don’t possess. The technique, developed before DNA testing, can’t definitively tie suspects to crime scenes. Try explaining that to juries — or some judges. — Read on http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/12/how-the-junk-science-of-hair-analysis-keeps-people-behind-bars/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, exoneration, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, human rights violations, junk forensic science, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Getting rid of bitemark believers. Updated Evidence Rule Warns Judges Against Junk Science

Changes to a new federal rule of evidence will go into effect on Friday, reminding judges that they should be extra vigilant about not allowing “junk science” from expert witnesses to reach juries. — Read on news.bloomberglaw.com/employee-benefits/updated-evidence-rule-warns-judges-against-junk-science

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Anatomy of junk forensics baffling Juries that don’t understand forensic science who send innocent people to prison − a short training video could help

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary… — Read on http://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/juries-that-don-t-understand-forensic-science-can-18393874.php

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Exoneration costs, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, Uncategorized, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: OUCH!Connecticut agrees to a $25 million settlement in the Henry Lee evidence fabrication case | AP News

Connecticut’s attorney general has agreed to a $25.2 million settlement with two men who spent decades in prison for murder, based partly on evidence presented by famed forensic scientist Henry Lee that a judge later found was fabricated. — Read … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration | Leave a comment

Forensics: DAs seldom get punished for misconduct. Wrongful Convictions Cost Chicago Taxpayers $153M from 2019 to 2023: Analysis | Chicago News

That toll is set to grow in the coming weeks, as the Chicago City Council considers paying $25 million to resolve separate lawsuits filed in 2016 by two men who spent a combined 34 years in prison after being wrongly … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Read your own declaration before going to court. FBI investigates key witness for Bryan Kohberger’s defense

Rather than cross-examine an expert witness for the defense of Idaho murder suspect Bryan Kohberger, Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson flagged the FBI to investigate her following some contradictory testimony. — Read on http://www.fox13seattle.com/news/fbi-investigates-key-witness-for-bryan-kohbergers-defense

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensis: Excellent Review. THE CHALLENGES TO THE FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN BITE MARKS IN SKIN Etc.

Conclusions reveal why bm opinions are invalid. Skin distortion and cognitive biases are paramount. Great literature review. View of THE CHALLENGES TO THE FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN BITE MARKS IN SKIN AND COMPARISON WITH TEETH — Read on esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/4142/99193547137

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, open access forensic information, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

‘Flawed’ bitemark evidence in court could lead to wrongful convictions, even death sentences – Study Finds – @The_AAFS

The American Academy of Forensics Sciences should pay attention and remove these dentists’ accreditation. According to the findings, bitemarks on skin do not transfer accurately, and even minor distortions could potentially match a large number of individuals. — Read on … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, exoneration, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment