Category Archives: forensic evidence exaggeration

Forensics: The Innocence Projects’ plans for its next 30 years.

innocenceproject.org/in-the-vanguard-of-justice-reform-the-road-ahead/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, exoneration, facial recognition, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: First Black female in Tennessee. A 74-Year-Old Black Woman Gets Exonerated After Spending 28 Years in Prison

Joyce Watkins was granted parole in 2015, but she immediately began taking steps towards clearing her name and getting her 1988 conviction overturned. — Read on http://www.complex.com/life/black-woman-exoneration-prison-innocence

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, Mass Disaster recovery, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: False/misleading forensics compose 24% of wrongfully convicted nation wide. Michiganders have lost more than 1,415 years of freedom

Deniers of these stats blame the lawyers. Wrongful convictions have led to Michiganders spending at least 1,417 years in prison. Nationwide, exonerees have lost at least 26,289 years to prison. — Read on http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/wrongfully-convicted-michiganders-have-lost-more-than-1415-years-of-freedom

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, Exoneration costs, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform, forensic science reform protecting the innocent, human rights violations, junk forensic science, police crime labs, US Crime labs | Leave a comment

Forensics: Despite misuse, exaggeration, and bad convictions. How Texas almost banned forensic hypnosis.

The controversial practice of using forensic hypnosis in Texas courtroom was almost banned when it passed unanimously the legislature. But then Gov. Abbott vetoed it. — Read on http://www.tpr.org/news/2021-12-15/how-texas-almost-banned-forensic-hypnosis

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Few are overturned. Even fewer are exonerated. No new science because there never was any science to begin with. Overturned abusive head trauma and shaken baby syndrome convictions in the United States

Overturned abusive head trauma and shaken baby syndrome convictions in the United States: Prevalence, legal basis, and medical evidence – ScienceDirect — Read on http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014521342100449X

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic pathology, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensic misconduct: Retraction of a peer reviewed article suggests ongoing problems within Australian forensic science

A story about forensic bigwigs eating their young and journal editors quivering in fear. — Read on http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X21000784

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Crime lab scandal, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Forensics: Judges should listen to ‘Why Defense Forensics Experts Matter’

The presentation of forensic evidence is typically one-sided in many US criminal courts. — Read on http://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/law-and-psychology/202104/why-defense-forensics-experts-matter

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, CSI, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensics: Money making Detection Dog Program | Global Forensic and Justice Center | Florida International University

Let us see some data, on false positives, negatives, and blinded dog handler protocols. They always start by saying how dogs have more olfactory capabilities and then use their “successes” rather than proper testing methods. Here is a recent article … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, CSI, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: How is this considered reliable? Should a dog’s sniff be enough to convict a person of murder? | Science | AAAS

Should a dog’s sniff be enough to convict a person of murder? | Science | AAAS — Read on http://www.science.org/content/article/should-dog-s-sniff-be-enough-convict-person-murder

Posted in AAFS, CSI, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct, human rights violations | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Forensics: #ForensicOdontology Another victim of America’s greatest forensics fraudster has been exonerated – The Washington Post

Radley Balko has co-authored with Tucker Carrington ‘The Cadver King and the Country Dentist.” This WP piece is just a glimpse into how courts keep supporting over-reaching and fradulent “forensic scientists.” The number of experts who can claim to have … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, Dr. Michael West, exoneration, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment