Category Archives: forensic testimony

Forensics: False positives. Rhode Island Department of Health Forensic Chemistry Lab Contamination Investigation

Authorities are reviewing hundreds of test results at the Rhode Island Department of Health lab over concerns they could have been contaminated, the state’s… — Read on http://www.necn.com/news/local/hundreds-of-cases-under-review-after-potential-contamination-at-ri-forensics-lab/2947766/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime, Crime lab scandal, Forensic crime lab security issues, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, forensic toxicology, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensic DNA: When the Question is Not Who, But How

Examining courtroom testimony using the framework of Evett et al’s hierarchy for propositions. — Read on promega.foleon.com/theishireport/the-ishi-report-february-2022/when-the-question-is-not-who-but-how/

Posted in AAFS, DNA mixtures, DNA profiling, Forensic Science, forensic testimony | Leave a comment

Forensics: What is an expert and what to do about it.

A good read about how Daubert expert evidence rules have been misapplied by 100 of judges. New Rule 702 might help. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/bloomberg-law-analysis/analysis-say-goodbye-to-daubert-motion-hello-to-new-rule-702/?utm_source=Email_Share

Posted in 702 expert rules for admissibility, AAFS, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic testimony | 1 Comment

Foreniscs: Its bites, guns and hair again. Why a High-Ranking FBI Attorney Is Pushing ‘Unbelievable’ Junk Science on Guns

This science-denial trope is endemic and will not die. Forensic analysts testify at trials as “experts.” But juries don’t know that their methods “seriously underestimate the false positive rate.” — Read on http://www.thedailybeast.com/the-fbi-keeps-pushing-junk-science-to-win-convictions

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Go Alicia! Reforming Forensics: Why Academics Are Challenging the Science Behind U.S. Criminal Justice | Discover Magazine

Academics are fighting to reform criminal justice techniques — many of which are based on thin and outdated science — that have incriminated hundreds of innocent people in the U.S. — Read on http://www.discovermagazine.com/technology/reforming-forensics-why-academics-are-challenging-the-science-behind-criminal-justice

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, Forensic Science, forensic science reform, forensic testimony, police crime labs, US Crime labs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Taphonomy dispute. Father’s defense opens with expert pointing to potential wildlife role in 13-year-old son’s death

Father’s defense opens with expert pointing to potential wildlife role in 13-year-old son’s death — Read on http://www.mercurynews.com/2021/07/12/mark-redwine-trial-dylan-redwine-defense/

Posted in AAFS, Forensic Science, forensic testimony | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Forensics: Some Medical Examiners Say Sickle Cell Trait Causes Sudden Death–They’re Wrong – Scientific American @theNAME1966

This needs to be addressed. Scientific American is the essential guide to the most awe-inspiring advances in science and technology, explaining how they change our understanding of the world and shape our lives. — Read on http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/some-medical-examiners-say-sickle-cell-trait-causes-sudden-death-theyre-wrong/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, forensic pathology, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform, forensic testimony, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Commission refers the 1998 murder conviction of Justin Plummer to the Court of Appeal due to bitemark expert

Its a prime example of a dentist testimony exceeding the limits of scientific knowledge. These guys are always “very convincing.” Commission refers the murder conviction of Justin Plummer to the Court of Appeal | Criminal Cases Review Commission — Read … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Beware of forensic experts expressing certainty

Opinion piece about reigning-in exaggerated and one-sided expert testimony. Offers a free online tutorial via Coursera. Its organized by Christophe Champod and the UNIL forensics faculty. “Challenging Forensic Science: How science should speak to court.” I just signed up. Expert … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic testimony | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Forensics: Chauvin Trial Expert Witness in Mob Crosshairs — The Patriot Post

431 physicians and a state AG called a “mob” for investigation of Chauvin forensic expert. Why would any expert ever again testify in a politically charged case? — Read on patriotpost.us/articles/79509-chauvin-trial-expert-witness-in-mob-crosshairs-2021-04-29

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, expert testimony, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, forensic testimony | Tagged , , | Leave a comment