Monthly Archives: March 2017

These 8 serial executions in Arkansas are sickening.

The death penalty is broken, but that isn’t stopping Arkansas. The state plans to execute 8 people in 10 days so it can use up nearly-expired – and dangerous – execution drugs. Arkansas’s planned assembly line of executions is irresponsible, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Progressive DAs get backlash from their “lock-em-up” peers like Michael Ramos

District Attorney Aramis D. Ayala of Orlando, FL is getting targeted for realizing that the death penalty is only in play in 0.01% of her criminal cases and is much too expensive to pursue. Elected Senior Prosecutors and police chiefs … Continue reading

Posted in Forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Leading Australian state DNA analyst seems to be in a bit of a pickle

This one article ( from a large collection) about a very senior Western Australia DNA prosecutorial lab DNA scientist raises a bunch of questions on his decades long case work. Here are some key comments: State’s leading DNA expert sacked. … Continue reading

Posted in Forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Forensics: Archaic and scientifically bogus TX mental disability statute ruled unconstitutional

SCOTUS Rejects Texas’s Death Penalty Standards for Disabled Inmates – This could be huge for other states to follow suit regarding mental competence and the death penalty. Texas’s standards for evaluating mentally disabled death row inmates are unconstitutional, the Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Proactive DA takes on issue of 600 cases involving chemist with drug addiction

This DA doing the right thing quickly. “From various parts of the country over the years have come stories about prosecutors and courts reluctant to overturn convictions even when defendants’ rights have been violated or when key evidence subsequently proved … Continue reading

Posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Genetic ‘Stop and Frisk’ not such of a magic bullet after all – Familial DNA issues

  It seems that most police sciences get validated (at least some do) AFTER the cops start using it. While DNA profiling is considered the ‘gold standard’ for identification (not DNA mixtures, however),  this run-up to its use as a … Continue reading

Posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocence | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Bitemark pattern used to overturn case against New Orleans defendant

Once again, an ABFO dentist uses bitemark patterns to persuade a judge that there is  ‘science’ behind skin injuries and tooth comparisons. This time is to say the defendant’s teeth “didn’t match.” A new trial was ordered. http://www.theadvocate.com/new_orleans/news/courts/article_49cb7944-13fe-11e7-8dc6-9fe2d1aa4f30.html  

Posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida ‘dog sniffing’ police ‘science’ cases ignored by DAs and CJ system

Nothing seems more outlandish than dogs being use to track down criminals and being used as eye witnesses to a defendant’s guilt. Read this story about multiple cases of conviction added by another police ‘science.’ I would add another example … Continue reading

Posted in forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Netherlands custody death brings out the ‘perfect’ expert for the cops defence

This is what courts commonly see when expert wits are qualified as keepers of specialized knowledge regarding in-custody deaths. He is a government employee in Amsterdam. http://nltimes.nl/2017/03/29/expert-forensics-witness-history-backing-cops-violence-cases-report Here is a journal article with this same expert, Kees Das, showing up … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Erin Murphy on NY State’s adoption of familial DNA profiling

Familial testing means that, depending on what the police decide on the necessary number of alleles that “match,” law enforcement will look into cousins, siblings, parents and unknown relatives who are in databases that are largely unregulated. Law Prof Erin … Continue reading

Posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , | Leave a comment