Category Archives: expert testimony

#Forensic Testimony: Science, Law and Expert Evidence: A Book Review

The latest review of this book is by Professor Jane Taylor, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah NSW 2011, New South Wales, Australia. The book is published by Elsevier/Academic Press and is available on Amazon.com. Forensic Testimony by C. Michael Bowers. This is a … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, criminal justice, expert testimony, Forensic Science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Despite unknown DNA from murder weapon: Other unreliable Forensic Evidence continues 20 year incarceration

The story continues of US judicial ignorance of scientific advances and what is “innocence.”  Judges continue to adopt prosecutorial advocacy themes of “guilt regardless.”  At the appellate level,  erroneous forensic testimony from over-reaching experts , once presented as “scientifically certain” at … Continue reading

Posted in Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, expert testimony, Forensic Science, forensic testimony, William Richards Exoneration Case, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Forensic Dentistry: Examination of Elder and Child Abuse

A presentation showing population data and clinical cases of physical abuse on elders and children. The material has been used in the forensic science curricula at the University of Southern California Ostrow School of Dentistry in Los Angeles, CA USA. … Continue reading

Posted in Community Dentistry, criminal justice, expert testimony, Forensic Science | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Forensic Testimony: New text book on ethical practices vs. wrongful convictions

Expert witness books tend to be dry and strictly formulative in style. Most provide lists of evidence rules (in mind-numbing legalese) and tips about being clever and convincing in court. You won’t find much of that in Forensic Testimony: Science, Law … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice, expert testimony | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Bitemark Forensic Science: who is at fault for 25 cases of bad results?

The backbiting (pun intended) response by the ABFO (a forensic bite mark board recognized by the AAFS) leadership against its own membership (N=108) involved in the 24 cases of erroneous convictions and incarcerations leads everyone to wonder “who are they?”  … Continue reading

Posted in Bite Marks, criminal justice, CSI, expert testimony, Forensic Science | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Judge believes the “Flat Earth” bitemark believers: Forensic Science

This judge uses a NY case ruling called the Frye standard, created in 1923, to allow bitemark comparisons into his court as “science.” http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202618278480&In_Pivotal_Test_NY_Judge_OKs_Bite_Mark_Evidence&slreturn=20130806185424

Posted in criminal justice, CSI, expert testimony, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forensic Testimony: when the pathologist gets things very wrong: Forensic Science

For decades Steve Hayne was the go to guy for Mississippi prosecutors like Forrest Allgood of Noxubee County. Both have a long record of involvement in wrongful convictions and questionable theories and opinions on a defendant’s guilt. Allgood has the … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, criminal justice, CSI, expert testimony, Forensic Science, forensic testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Forensic Testimony: PBS/Frontline: Forensic Science

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/criminal-justice/real-csi/can-juries-rely-on-forensic-experts

Posted in criminal justice, expert testimony, Forensic Science, forensic testimony | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensic Testimony: Hired Guns or …..what? / Forensic Science

Judges to not have the tools to counteract the effects of biased experts. See PBS/Frontline/CSI http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/criminal-justice/real-csi/can-juries-rely-on-forensic-experts/

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, CSI, expert testimony, Forensic Science, forensic testimony, wrongful convictions | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Investigative Report: Inside reporters’ efforts in an exoneration case: Forensic Science

A triumvirate of Pulitzer-winning reporters spent years in supporting a victim of a misguided prosecution aided by willful misconduct by Chicago police. A retrospective article on what the reporters experienced with the wrongfully convicted Daniel Taylor, written by Maurice Possley, … Continue reading

Posted in Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, Exoneration costs, expert testimony, Forensic Science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment