Category Archives: junk forensic science

‘152 Innocence Marked For Death’ : New York Times disses the US death penalty laws

Nothing like actual problem-based research to see the disconnect between hard line “crime and justice fighters” with what problems exists in the US criminal justice system. problems. New York Times New York Innocence Project Another example of an innocent man’s … Continue reading →

Posted in death penalty, junk forensic science, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Cops try to minimize crime lab’s 5 year failure to supervise

Nothing looks more silly than a cop telling the public five years of his crime lab’s malfeasance is nothing to worry about. A jury seems not to care either. http://m.sfexaminer.com/sanfrancisco/doubts-about-failed-dna-technician-surfaced-in-2010/Content?oid=2925589

Posted in criminal justice, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, police crime labs | Leave a comment

BACK to Supreme Court to test new law on forensic ‘science’

A remarkably sad, infuriating  and frustrating ordeal one man in California prison has experienced for 22 years is winding up in intensity. William Richards’ 1997 murder conviction in San Bernardino had been overturned by a habeas corpus hearing in 2010, … Continue reading →

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, criminal justice, Forensic Science, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Investigation of forensic science misconduct and deception

Must read. Includes comments from UK expert Professor Iain Pretty. Im still waiting for a response from the US forensic dental group. I think they are in hiding. Thats too bad because they may miss out on some uncoming judicial … Continue reading →

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

False forensic bitemark case gets another CA high court look

William Richards’ newest attempt for freedom centers on this application of a new law expecting the judiciary to know something about junk forensic science. http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-bite-mark-court-20150318-story.html

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, exoneration, junk forensic science | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

24 forensic exonerations and dismissals later: bitemark matchers still in control

Nothing says how messed-up forensics science reform is than this 4 part series on the “elite” of the AAFS. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2015/02/20/the-path-forward-on-bite-mark-matching-and-the-rearview-mirror

Posted in Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Manhattan DA Melissa Mourges redacts 2009 NAS Forensic Report to mislead Frye hearing judge

Following with my previous blog’s theme of prosecutorial misconduct, here is a recent standout in the NYC courts’ process of determining science-affirmed expert testimony versus ‘forensic’ claptrap of a baser kind. This story exposes how lawyers bend facts to suit their … Continue reading →

Posted in criminal justice, expert testimony, junk forensic science, Perjury by Prosecutors | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

New Junk Forensic Science comes your way from Alabama

Nothing says ‘forensic science’ better that the state of Alabama. Its evidentiary statutes and case law (stare decisis) contains convictions later overturned by DNA. And, its District Attorneys (Hi there, Steve Marshall, from Marshall County, ALA) allow forensic experts to testify like … Continue reading →

Posted in CSI, expert testimony, junk forensic science | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Faulty Forensic Science Failing US Court System – Op-Ed from Live Sciences

“Karen Kafadar is Commonwealth Professor and chair of the Department of Statistics at the University of Virginia and a member of the Forensic Science Standards Board. Anne-Marie Mazza is the director of the Committee on Science, Technology and Law of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Forensic Science, junk forensic science, US Crime labs | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The path forward on bite mark matching — and the rearview mirror #AAFS2015

This is the final article of the Washington Post’s Radley Balko’s 4 part series on forensic science reform and the personalities and organizations (legal advocates and forensic groups) involved on both sides of the discussion. The first three articles are … Continue reading →

Posted in AAFS, Bitemarks, criminal justice, exoneration, expert testimony, forensic science reform, junk forensic science | Leave a comment