Category Archives: junk forensic science

The destructive path of bitemark analysis

http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Washington_Post_Series_Examines_Destructive_Path_of_Bite_Mark_Analysis.php

Posted in Bite Marks, Bitemarks, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Advances in Forensic Fire Science leads to man’s release after 36 years in prison

The article at the end quotes the defense attorney saying “the criminal justice system works.” Thats one side of the coin, and it may be a bit of a stretch, but is not the entire story. It has taken forensic … Continue reading →

Posted in Bitemarks, exoneration, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Evidence tampering in the US crime lab system

This ex crime lab “scientist” took a very strange road much to the detriment of defendants’ rights of fairness and due process in court. http://www.adn.com/article/20150123/former-state-crime-lab-employee-pleads-guilty-theft-evidence-tampering

Posted in Forensic Science, forensic science reform, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Another DA hopes to support bad Shaken Baby “science” with legal mumbo-jumbo during appeal

Game of Lawyers: Another DA hoping to support bad forensic sciences with legalistic mumbo jumbo. DA to Appeal Shaken Baby Conviction Reversal  via @WrongConvBlog The Wrongful Conviction Blog article correctly opines that a higher court’s supporting the banishment of medical support for … Continue reading →

Posted in junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Junk Forensic Science Shows Up at the 2015 American Academy of Forensic Sciences Meeting – Again

Forensic science fails in specific controversial areas of wherein “classic” investigation methods, never brought forth by the scientific method, are still posing as “business as usual.”. Think of the “matches” you hear about on TV.  Ignore DNA and Toxicology. This is … Continue reading →

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, Forensic Science, forensic science reform, junk forensic science, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

More on the CSI myth in forensic science

The case described in the first link is Gerard Richardson, not Henderson. I have written past articles on his conviction aided via a small cadre of bitemark experts. The second link is today’s op-ed from the Huff Post about similar … Continue reading →

Posted in AAFS, exoneration, Forensic Science, junk forensic science | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Vigil for the CA 11: Factually Innocent, Families ask for clemency

I attended this candle lit vigil with families of 11 prisoners in Cailfornia prisons. These cases show how false forensic science, inept lawyers and the legal system’s inadequate response to new science needs to be reviewed by Governor @JerryBrown. These … Continue reading →

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, junk forensic science, prosecutorial misconduct, William Richards Exoneration Case | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Recent Rash of US Exonerations Only the Surface: Many More Remain Wrongfully Imprisoned : Forensic Science contributions

  Jeffrey Deskovic, an exoneree himself (NY), writes about the increase in wrongful convictions being overturned in the US from a very personal perspective. He focuses on the root causes of these injustices such as incentivised witnesses (aka snitches), prosecutorial … Continue reading →

Posted in exoneration, junk forensic science | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

DNA versus ABFO bitemark opinion and the FBI CODIS gaff denies chance to find the real murderer

Click picture for Gerard’s post exoneration video The NY Innocence Projects’s fight to identify a murderer is blocked by a ridiculous FBI rule about “lawyer lab certification.” All this started with another wrongful conviction ( N=1480 at the National Registry … Continue reading →

Posted in ABFO, Bitemarks, criminal justice, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Despite DNA, California Courts say Expert testimony is “merely an opinion” and “can’t be false”

FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM This past year has been a tremendous success for the California Innocence Project on many fronts, from successes in the courtroom to increased media and public awareness of our cause and mission.  2014 also saw success in … Continue reading →

Posted in forensic science reform, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment