More on the CSI myth in forensic science

The case described in the first link is Gerard Richardson, not Henderson. I have written past articles on his conviction aided via a small cadre of bitemark experts. The second link is today’s op-ed from the Huff Post about similar issues of overstated or outright junk opines. The American Academy of Forensic Sciences still maintains its veneer as a pinnacle of “forensic truth” despite some members getting a free pass for their faulty representations in court. Faulty forensics contributes to nearly 50% of the Innocence Projects’ exonerations.

DOUBTS ABOUT CRIME LABS 

HUFF POST blog 

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS, exoneration, Forensic Science, junk forensic science and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to More on the CSI myth in forensic science

  1. mespo727272 says:

    Mike:

    Thanks for supplying the correct name of the defendant in my article. I have asked for it to be edited to so reflect.

    Mark Esposito, Esq.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s