Tag Archives: forensic testimony

#Forensic #Science #Commission Pushbacks against Junk Forensic Experts

Progress is being  made towards Forensic Science Reform.  It has taken 5 years to get coordinated (but preliminary) recommendations  from organized forensic practitioners since the 2009 NAS Report on “Strengthening Forensics Sciences.” The NAS slammed a fistful of long accepted forensic … Continue reading

Posted in expert testimony, Forensic Science | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Eyewitness IDs : The Main cause of Wrongful Convictions gets a do-over by the National Research Counsel

After decades of legal and more recent research on doubtful eyewitness testimony has led to this Report from the NRC/NAS. The best reads on this type of “evidence” used by prosecutors are: 1) Professor Brandon Garrett’s “Convicting the Innocent.” 2) … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice, exoneration | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

More professional harassment of forensic experts, this time a pathologist. Plus political action spurred by bitemark case.

This is becoming commonplace. Another forensic expert gets job slammed for testifying against a Prosecutor’s “theory” of a case. CA: Prosecutors Suppress a Mountain of Evidence in Shaky Murder Case  Read about other examples of professional harassment of forensic experts both … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, expert testimony, prosecutorial misconduct | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Forensic in Focus: From Witch hunts, criminal justice to some not so real forensic science.

Proof that CJ is not “always right.” TN exoneration joins growing number of innocence cases. Bitemarks included. 1 of 25 are innocent. Prosecutorial misconduct in Japan. Japan’s Authoritarian Criminal Justice System. Tells the Facts, Names the Names  The American Board … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice, fingerprints, Forensic Science, National FOrensic Science Commission, prosecutorial misconduct | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

NY Times: “DNA Analysis Exposes an Inexact Forensic Science” + Bitemark Cases

For over 2 decades, the US press has used “inexact” in writing about certain forensic methods which are used to convict criminal defendants. Bitemark experts included. Here is the latest from the New York Times. It uses the debunked FBI’s … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, Forensic Science, forensic science reform | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

FORENSIC FOCUS LINKS @CSIDDS | Feb 19| WHAT’S OUT THERE TODAY | NEWS, SCIENCE, AND THE LAW

FORENSIC FOCUS @CSIDDS LINKS | Feb 19 | COLD CASE: Oregon suspect linked to AZ cold case as crime scene fingerprints “resubmitted” to the Federally managed archive. I wonder what happened to the first submission? The cold case is 40 … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

#Forensic Testimony: Science, Law and Expert Evidence: A Book Review

The latest review of this book is by Professor Jane Taylor, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah NSW 2011, New South Wales, Australia. The book is published by Elsevier/Academic Press and is available on Amazon.com. Forensic Testimony by C. Michael Bowers. This is a … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, criminal justice, expert testimony, Forensic Science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Bitemark Forensic Science: who is at fault for 25 cases of bad results?

The backbiting (pun intended) response by the ABFO (a forensic bite mark board recognized by the AAFS) leadership against its own membership (N=108) involved in the 24 cases of erroneous convictions and incarcerations leads everyone to wonder “who are they?”  … Continue reading

Posted in Bite Marks, criminal justice, CSI, expert testimony, Forensic Science | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

US Exonerations: State by state with interactive data: Are there Forensic Science “Bad Apples?”

The NY Innocence Project has a virtual tour of exoneration data that quickly establishes the fact that wrongful convictions are NOT just a series of “bad apples” in an otherwise reliable (depending on your interpretation of “justice”) system. The bitemark … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, CSI, Forensic Science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Forensic Testimony: NY state examiner fails to look at all available evidence

The defense is critical about a NYSP DNA examiner’s decision to ignore evidence containing “known” multiple profiles. The “known” info comes from police investigators. It’s obvious the crime lab and the examiner are collaborating rather than separate entities. http://www.wetmtv.com/news/local/story/Continuing-Day-3-Testimony-in-Justin-Jones-Murder/nOTjPvOm9UGkGys9BAFxqA.cspx

Posted in criminal justice, CSI, Forensic Science, forensic testimony | Tagged | Leave a comment