Tag Archives: bite marks

Politicos start talking about flawed forensic sciences

Five US Senators weigh into flawed forensic methods exemplified by the FBI hair comparison fiasco. More. US Senate hearing on backlogged rape kits. $1B spent so far over ten years, the end is still not in sight. More.  Sweat from … Continue reading

Posted in costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, DNA profiling, Forensic science misconduct | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bias in Forensic Science: Affirmed and described by another retired forensic scientist | Forensics in Focus @csidds | April 1

The “new topic” of undue influence and cognitive bias (its been around for decades mostly from outside the insular forensic community) by forensic examiners gets some air in this editorial by a retired senior scientist from a Los Angeles crime lab. … Continue reading

Posted in Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic testimony | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

FORENSICS | THE SILVER BULLET? : $715,000, three year long research project promises to support admissibility of BITE MARK IDENTIFICATION

Too bad the chief investigator has a history of being involved in the wrongful conviction of  Robert Lee Stinson in WI. He reports (with other contributors, all are Marquette University faculty; mostly dentists)  results that support the bite mark “match” he … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, National FOrensic Science Commission | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

FORENSICS | Richardson Bite Mark case exposes ABFO experts’ assurances as folly

Being “tough on crime” is a cliche used by some involved in politics, law enforcement, and used by certain forensic practitioners. I prefer the phrase “smart on crime.”  Both may sound similar, but the “smart” inference means that forensic developments, … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bitemarks, Forensic Science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

BITEMARK EVIDENCE : THE FORENSIC DICHOTOMY : 24 CASES VS THEORIES

The courtroom and public rhetoric of bite mark proponents clearly ignores the reality of their casework. My latest book “Forensic Testimony” reveals the disconnect between judicial rules of evidence (which indicates the courts’ expectation of scientific reliability) and the self-serving … Continue reading

Posted in Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Forensic Science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

FORENSIC BITEMARKS: NOT CSI: ITS MORE LIKE A FORD PINTO

For my international readers, a Ford  Pinto (made in the 1970’s) was an American car whose gas tank filler neck had a bad tendency to break leading to explosions in automobile accidents. It was sold as a cheap but safe … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice, Forensic Science, forensic testimony, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

FORENSIC TESTIMONY | Bitemark reliability testing: See the real cases |FORENSIC EVIDENCE

A previous blog from CSI DDS stated that poor bite mark reliability (how often experts agree) is proof of the suspect nature of the outdated methods stubbornly maintained by leaders of the ABFO. Their opposition to review of its membership’s … Continue reading

Posted in Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, CSI, Forensic Science | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Forensic Testimony: Once again, exoneration cases support unreliability of experts trial opinions

Take some time (or more than one visit to get through the information) and follow this link (Forensic Testimony) to a greater understanding on why credibility for some forensic experts is waning or finally being extinguished. The chart posted above … Continue reading

Posted in Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, CSI, Exoneration costs, expert testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bite mark expert defends his methods as good for the court system without scientific validation

Use this as a counter-point to the recent Associated Press investigation on the failure of bite mark comparisons as a reliable forensic science. Over at the Bite Marks Evidence blog, David Averill posts this incredible video used in a 2011 … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, CSI, Forensic Science, Wrongful Conviction | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The use of DNA from bite marks takes casework, status and money from ABFO dentists

The AP article (use your search engine for “bite marks” and “unreliable”) in June 2013 suggested that the bite mark dentists of the American Board of Forensic Odontology have been “supplanted by the more reliable science of DNA.” More recently, … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, CSI, Forensic Science, William Richards Exoneration Case | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment