Category Archives: Forensic Science Bias

Forensics: SBS in OZ. Top scientists question basis for Victoria’s baby shaking prosecutions

Three young men are about to appeal against their convictions for killing or injuring infants by shaking them. The scientific community is split on the subject. So are the convictions sound? — Read on http://www.smh.com.au/national/top-scientists-question-basis-for-victoria-s-baby-shaking-prosecutions-20210513-p57rkm.html

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science reform, Medical errors | Leave a comment

Forensics: How Your DNA—or Someone Else’s—Can Send You to Jail

Although DNA is individual to you—a “fingerprint” of your genetic code—DNA samples don’t always tell a complete story. The DNA samples used in criminal prosecutions are generally of low quality, making them particularly complicated to analyze. They are not very … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, DNA mixtures, DNA profiling, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias | Leave a comment

Forensics: Beware of forensic experts expressing certainty

Opinion piece about reigning-in exaggerated and one-sided expert testimony. Offers a free online tutorial via Coursera. Its organized by Christophe Champod and the UNIL forensics faculty. “Challenging Forensic Science: How science should speak to court.” I just signed up. Expert … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic testimony | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Forensics: 1985 MOVE massacre official fired for cremating victims.

http://www.huffpost.com/entry/philly-health-chief-ousted-move-bombing-remains_n_609dbff4e4b069dc48f8ea72

Posted in AAFS, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, human identification, human rights violations | Leave a comment

Forensics: AAFS 2012 meeting abstract on the failure of bitemark analysis

This one got me no love from the ABFO bitemarkers.

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Uncategorized, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Fake police field testing. Bogus cocaine charge led to exoneration and now, a lawsuit against Buffalo

In a Buffalo News article in September, Morgan Eaton called his arrest in March 2020 a case study in driving while Black. — Read on buffalonews.com/content/tncms/live/

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice reform, CSI, forensic fraud, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct | Tagged | 1 Comment

Forensics: How junk “research” enters mainstream academia. External Qi – Science Integrity Digest

External Qi – Science Integrity Digest — Read on scienceintegritydigest.com/2019/05/24/external-qi/amp/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Medical errors | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Forensics: Discussion: How to Avoid Mistakes and Bias. When Forensic Evidence Convicts the Innocent

When Forensic Evidence Convicts the Innocent | The Crime Report — Read on thecrimereport.org/2021/05/03/when-forensic-evidence-convicts-the-innocent/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bite Marks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, CSI, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Chauvin trial aftermath: In defense of Dr. David Fowler. (Weak). 531 think otherwise. The case of the incredible expert

As usual, forensic pathology opinion controversy results in much semantics and little scientific data. The semantics do talk about “science” and “standards” but very little else is available for factual guidance. Widely criticized for his testimony in the Derek Chauvin … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, expert testimony, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics and Anthro: Larger issues about the MOVE bombing victims: The remains at Princeton and the Penn Museum are part of a horrific open secret.

The “bad old days” of the 19th century are still very much here. — Read on slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/04/move-bombing-victims-princeton-penn-museum-history-anthropology.html

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias | Tagged | Leave a comment