Three young men are about to appeal against their convictions for killing or injuring infants by shaking them. The scientific community is split on the subject. So are the convictions sound?
— Read on www.smh.com.au/national/top-scientists-question-basis-for-victoria-s-baby-shaking-prosecutions-20210513-p57rkm.html
Forensics: SBS in OZ. Top scientists question basis for Victoria’s baby shaking prosecutions
This entry was posted in AAFS, criminal justice, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science reform, Medical errors. Bookmark the permalink.
