As usual, forensic pathology opinion controversy results in much semantics and little scientific data. The semantics do talk about “science” and “standards” but very little else is available for factual guidance.

Widely criticized for his testimony in the Derek Chauvin case, his tenure under review by the Maryland Attorney General, this can’t be the retirement Maryland’s former medical examiner expected.
— Read on www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/columnists/dan-rodricks/bs-md-rodricks-0502por-fowler-testimony-20210430-k3l6pdzgoraj5bb5bwarobaazu-story.html