Opinion piece about reigning-in exaggerated and one-sided expert testimony. Offers a free online tutorial via Coursera. Its organized by Christophe Champod and the UNIL forensics faculty. “Challenging Forensic Science: How science should speak to court.” I just signed up.
Expert witnesses sometimes express certainty when there is room for doubt
— Read on www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/beware-of-forensic-experts-expressing-certainty-1.4564325
Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS
, costs of wrongful convictions
, criminal justice
, criminal justice reform
, expert testimony
, forensic evidence exaggeration
, Forensic Science
, Forensic Science Bias
, forensic testimony
and tagged courtroom testimony
, Forensic science
, scientific uncertainty
. Bookmark the permalink
The Irish Times article hits ALL the hot buttons. Mayfield, McKie…and back to Dreyfus.