Forensics: The controversial company using DNA to sketch the faces of criminals

Typical situation. Privacy vs police.

Parabon Nanolabs shot to fame using DNA and genealogy analysis to solve cold cases. Then it had to change tack.
— Read on www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02545-5

Posted in AAFS, CSI, DNA profiling, Forensic Science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Psychology. A look at the psyche of DJTrump by @davidfrum: So Trump has confirmed in his own voice that he was not self-deluded about Covid-19.

Thread by @davidfrum: I made this point w @AriMelber tonight am still brooding on it: So Trump has confirmed in his own voice that he was notluded about COVID. He knew the danger – and still opted to do nothing and instead belittle the risk in public. Th…
— Read on threadreaderapp.com/thread/1303855414115799040.html

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, human rights violations, junk forensic science, Mass Disaster recovery | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Forensics: Fudging the data results from (Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science – ScienceDirect

Jeez. This sure looks look no one took a class on experimental design at the FBI Academy. If one even exists. What an embarrassment.

(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science – ScienceDirect
— Read on www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X20300553

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Crime lab scandal, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, junk forensic science, US Crime labs | Leave a comment

Forensics: As expected FP Examiners are all over the map. Examining and expanding the friction ridge value decision.

Is thus really a “science?” More like tea leaves, phrenology or astrology. Some FP folks are really concerned.

Examining and expanding the friction ridge value decision – ScienceDirect
— Read on www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037907382030270X

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, fingerprints, Forensic Science Bias, human identification | Leave a comment

Forensics: Im sure they would wear masks. Homo heidelbergensis was Extremely Resourceful

New research pieces together the activities and movements of a group of Homo heidelbergensis, a poorly understood species of archaic humans that lived between 700,000 to 200,000 years ago, as they made tools, including the oldest bone tools documented in Europe, and extensively butchered a large horse at the 480,000-year-old archaeological site near Boxgrove, Sussex, the United Kingdom.
— Read on www.sci-news.com/archaeology/homo-heidelbergensis-horse-butchery-site-08812.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forensics: Bitemarks, hair matching, snitches and junk opinions. Robert Duboise’s case merits new commitment to justice in Florida

The most recent case of innocence has much in common with other wrongful convictions, including flawed forensic science and lying jailhouse “snitches.”
— Read on www.staugustine.com/story/opinion/2020/09/02/robert-duboises-case-merits-new-commitment-justice-florida/5693919002/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, DNA profiling, junk forensic science, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forensics: How not to exaggerate DNA Likelihood ratios for lawyers.

It all starts with lawyers and judges learning some science. Good luck with that. Someone says “knowledge is not understanding.” This piece desxribes the didference.

By Raymond ValerioChief of the Forensic Science Unit, Bronx County (New York) District Attorney’s Office Knowing this, I wrote an article for the WIRE…
— Read on www.tdcaa.com/journal/likelihood-ratios-for-lawyers/

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, DNA mixtures, DNA profiling, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, human identification | Leave a comment

Bite Mark Evidence: What You Should Know About This Debunked Science

Bite mark evidence has sent at least two dozen innocent people to prison. So why is this debunked forensic method still being used?
— Read on www.innocenceproject.org/what-is-bite-mark-evidence-forensic-science/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, Dr. Michael West, exoneration, Forensic Science, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Another bitemarker conviction gets vacated.

courts.ms.gov/Images/Opinions/CO148586.pdf

This case from MS has taken over 25 to litigate for Eddie Lee Howard. Read about the famous flim flam artist Dr. Michael West talk about own brilliance. Kudos to all!!

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, CSI, Dr. Michael West, forensic fraud, Forensic Science, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: State Attorney: DNA exonerates man in 1983 Tampa murder

Adding to the long list of bitemarker mis IDs. The dentist claims that bitemarks still work for investigations. He has always been happy claiming he brought Ted Bundy “to justice.”

The Innocence Project and Hillsborough State Attorney Andrew Warren’s conviction review unit determined that new DNA tests demonstrate Robert Duboise is not guilty in the rape and murder of Barbara Grams.
— Read on www.tampabay.com/news/hillsborough/2020/08/26/state-attorney-dna-exonerates-man-in-1983-tampa-murder/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, criminal justice, Dr. Michael West, Forensic Science, junk forensic science, Wrongful Conviction | 2 Comments