Category Archives: Bitemarks

Scientists create trepidation in certain forensic subjects. Target: Bitemarks

Here is a series of 2 posts by Dr. David Averill who is an ex-member and a past president (1995) of  the dental bitemark group, the ABFO. His posts are from February 2011. They contain:  1) the effect of recent … Continue reading

Posted in ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, criminal justice, forensic science reform | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Forensic Science Isn’t Science: Why juries hear—and trust—so much biased, unreliable, inaccurate evidence.

  Excellent Op-ED from SLATE on this serious subject relating to US public safety and  the US criminal justice system (CJS). Talks about wrongful executions, various types of cognitive biases and the lack of coordination between CJS, law enforcement and … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, Forensic Science Bias | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Bitemark case spurs judicial reform in CA., intimidation in forensics continues, + more

Forensic reform in California based in part on another bitemark case.  2011: Bitemark experts sue forensic lecturer regarding mention of Bennie Starks’ vacated conviction case. Later became a full exoneration when the DA dropped lesser remaining charges. The plantiffs in … Continue reading

Posted in ABFO, Bitemarks, criminal justice, forensic science reform, William Richards Exoneration Case, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

More professional harassment of forensic experts, this time a pathologist. Plus political action spurred by bitemark case.

This is becoming commonplace. Another forensic expert gets job slammed for testifying against a Prosecutor’s “theory” of a case. CA: Prosecutors Suppress a Mountain of Evidence in Shaky Murder Case  Read about other examples of professional harassment of forensic experts both … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, expert testimony, prosecutorial misconduct | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Who Pays the price for a False Forensic Identification? Plus Jack the Ripper is Backkkk , Cognitive Bias in Forensics.

When a forensic expert’s opinion on identification runs up against DNA. Who pays the price? http://bitemarks.org/  Expert testimony on eyewitness testimony allowed in state Supreme court. Experts on false confesses rejected. “the advent of DNA evidence, as well as hundreds of … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, Forensic Science Bias, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Real talk about forensics and real science: ex AAFS president is interested about forensic mistakes, DNA from bitemarks, + more.

This blog has reached 6,000 hits since its inception. Thank you all for being involved!  Cheers Mike Bowers  Please consider subscribing to this blog. ====================================== Real science POV. Forcing Change In Forensic Science.  http://cen.acs.org/articles/92/i19/Forcing-Change-Forensic-Science.html … via @cenmag A world apart is the … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, Forensic Science, forensic science reform, National FOrensic Science Commission | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Bitemark Identification Debunked? : People are still teaching dentists unreliable forensics

Sunday’s New York Times  piece on how “DNA Changed Forensic Science” was also an allegory. Much is in writing in the media about the deficiencies of bitemark identification. The 2009 landmark National Academies of Science Report on “Strengthening the Forensic … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science reform | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Comments on the White House 2014 report on “Strengthening Forensic Science”

Opinions from a forensic examiner. This material contains excerpts from the WH 2014 Forensic Science Report .  My comments (in bold) are added in certain sections. The Report excerpts are in italics. See the full report here. =========================================== EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF … Continue reading

Posted in ABFO, Bitemarks, criminal justice, Forensic Science, forensic science reform, National FOrensic Science Commission | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Bitemark Case Law: The Judicial failure by accepting bitemark experts as “qualified to identify” defendants

“Bitemark Identification” acceptance stems from this list of appellate cases starting in 1975 (Marx). This is a short list of the seminal cases (allowing the jury of decide the evidence declared to be science) that flowed from this first appellate … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, forensic science reform, junk forensic science, National FOrensic Science Commission | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Death sentences: A trail of dubious contributions to justice: questionable and in some cases, erroneous bitemark opinions.

I have reported on this subject before, as the continued acceptance of the bitemark id “pseudoscience” in US courts still allows this prejudicial type of prosecutorial expert opinion to be considered “relevant evidence.” Continuing on this topic, my experience as a defense … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, exoneration, Forensic Science, forensic testimony, Ray Krone bitemark case, William Richards Exoneration Case, wrongful convictions | 2 Comments