Latest News on Forensic Science and Criminal Law
-
Join 223 other subscribers
Author Archives: csidds
Bite mark experts sound desperate in AP review of bad forensic science
Well, the story had to come out eventually. The Associate Press extensive investigation into the US forensic dental organization, the American Board of Forensic Odontology (ABFO), reviews their past mistakes in court cases and current denials of problems in their … Continue reading
PBS-2012 Nova Production On Doubtful Forensic Science
With major contributors from the forensic science community, this in-depth PBS presentation discusses the strengths and weaknesses of forensic examiners and their effects on the US judicial system. Erroneous convictions involving bite mark identification and other “impression evidence” are the … Continue reading
An academic’s views on problems existing in forensic science testimony and methods
This is a repost of a 2009 article published by UCLA Today. The author is well established as an external evaluator of forensic methods. Shortly after this article appeared she was given a $700,000 research grant by the NIJ to … Continue reading
FORENSIC TESTIMONY: Science Biases and Subjectivity
This is a repost of my June 5, 2013 blog on the important subject of bias in forensic science Added comment: The expanding revelations of extraneous influences that can plague forensic experts in court has added to the existing literature … Continue reading
Posted in Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, CSI, Forensic Dentistry, wrongful convictions
Tagged ABFO, Bitemarks, Criminal Justice, Csi Effect, forensic dentistry, forensic examiner error, incentivised crime labs, junk forensic science, Radley Balko, THE AGITATOR, wrongful convictions
Leave a comment
50 Years of Judicially Determined BRADY Violations Against Prosecutors are Worthless
This op-ed from the HuffPost’s Radley Balko makes the case that prosecutorial misconduct is a factor in a majority of exoneration cases and exists in other criminal convictions. The judicial and legal organizational responses to violations of Brady are nil. Legal … Continue reading
The “equitable balance” of constitutional rights faces off with legal procedural technicalities
This op-ed politely discusses the dis-connect between what the Supreme Court considers their “view” of constitutional rights (really a procedural statute of limitations argument) without touching on the personal rights and privileges of the inmate seeking a review of eyewitness … Continue reading
Posted in Innocence March
Tagged Claim of Innocence, federal habeas corpus, statute of limitations
Leave a comment
Research on eyewitness, victim and expert recantations after convictions
The University of Michigan continues its investigation into the causes of wrongful convictions via their archive of over 1000 cases where an innocent person was sent to prison. The varied judicial responses to recanting witnesses contained in this 10 page … Continue reading
Brooklyn’s Sordid Prosecutorial Past, and Present?
The New York Times ——————————————————————————– May 11, 2013 Review of 50 Brooklyn Murder Cases Ordered By FRANCES ROBLES and N. R. KLEINFIELD The Brooklyn district attorney’s office has ordered a review of some 50 murder cases assigned to an acclaimed … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged district attorney, falsified evidence, junk science, prosecutorial misconduct
Leave a comment
Three more cases of discredited medical testimony and prosecutorial fallacies leading to wrongful convictions
5-19-2013 The Innocence March continues through Santa Barbara County towards Sacramento where they hope to present to Governor Jerry Brown petitions for clemency for 12 clients they consider factually innocent of serious crime. http://www.innocencemarch.com. The California Innocence Project (CIP) also highlights … Continue reading
Justin Brooks Update from the Innocence March…
Justin Brooks Update from the Innocence March….
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
