Author Archives: csidds

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.

What bad DAs ignore about junk #forensic science. The good DAs don’t ignore this stuff.

Take a look at a Forensics in Focus from 2013. None of the major forensics and criminal justice issues have changed. Dentists still testify in death penalty cases as if they were DNA experts. Prosecutors keep hiring them.    

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Jack the Ripper DNA ID debunked by Sir Alec Jeffries : #Forensic #experts get sued in $30M wrongful conviction suit

In the world of 2014 forensic news, this story should endup in the top 10. A book writer’s chief science consultant to the claim ole Jack was the immigrant Kominski just took a hit from a number of scientific notables … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice, CSI, Forensic Science, junk forensic science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The truth comes out in #ONR8 David McCallum’s NYC case plus Don’t self medicate and then testify in criminal court

Forensics expert ‘had been on medication’ in the witness box. When a DA and a judge obstruct DNA testing, it doesn’t matter if you are innocent, you stay in prison.  Forensic experts under major UK scrutiny. Are juries being blinded … Continue reading

Posted in Bite Marks, criminal justice, CSI, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Pushback from the bitemark believers denies bad cases can happen today. Total bs. Their keepers need to wake up.

The bitemark experts once AGAIN, promise that they will do better. Read the following recent website posting from their head honcho. As usual, nothing about where all his newly found reliability comes from. Maybe its his below-mentioned  “Tree” system? All the … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, junk forensic science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A “Cone of Silence” protects junk forensic science and allows it to survive in criminal courts.

Originally posted on FORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends:
Today’s subject is a brief look back at how pattern evidence from bruised human skin got into the case law of every state in the US. Its not…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Eyewitness IDs : The Main cause of Wrongful Convictions gets a do-over by the National Research Counsel

After decades of legal and more recent research on doubtful eyewitness testimony has led to this Report from the NRC/NAS. The best reads on this type of “evidence” used by prosecutors are: 1) Professor Brandon Garrett’s “Convicting the Innocent.” 2) … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice, exoneration | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SpaghettiO caper, Battles over Forensics, Public Policy efforts and wrongful convictions

In California, another bill involving a valiant attempt to prevent the strong correlation of prosecutorial misconduct (in over 800 cases, only less than a 2  handfusl have led to Bar sanctions against state prosecutors) and wrongful convictions was vetoed this … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice, CSI, exoneration, prosecutorial misconduct | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Anti-Junk Forensic Science bill is now law: Criminal Justice Public Policy Breakthrough in California

Originally posted on FORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends:
California Governor Jerry Brown just signed into law SB 1058 bill. The law permits habeas corpus petitioners (i.e. after a conviction) the ability to contest expert testimony that…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Anti-Junk Forensic Science bill is now law: Criminal Justice Public Policy Breakthrough in California

Originally posted on innocencemattersblog:
Anti-Junk Forensic Science bill is now law: Criminal Justice Public Policy Breakthrough in California.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Anti-Junk Forensic Science bill is now law: Criminal Justice Public Policy Breakthrough in California

California Governor Jerry Brown just signed into law SB 1058 bill. The law permits habeas corpus petitioners (i.e. after a conviction) the ability to contest expert testimony that was presented against them at trial. In other words, experts who either … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 4 Comments