Tag Archives: junk forensic science

“Worst miscarriages of justice in British law from grossly misleading forensic science” – Scotland

“Some of the worst miscarriages of justice in British legal history have come from cases in which the forensic science was later shown to have been grossly misleading.” Media Hype Typical second-hand and incorrect quotation regarding a Science article on … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice | Tagged | Leave a comment

More on the CSI myth in forensic science

The case described in the first link is Gerard Richardson, not Henderson. I have written past articles on his conviction aided via a small cadre of bitemark experts. The second link is today’s op-ed from the Huff Post about similar … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, exoneration, Forensic Science, junk forensic science | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Junk Science takes a hit from the Mississippi Supreme Court : Plus real and fake forensic research

Junk Science takes a hit from MS?? Incredible. Finally. There has been a very long forensic credibility battle in that state with its ex-non-certified pathologist at the epi-center. This battle includes bitemark convictions from his colleague Michael West.  Mississippi Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, prosecutorial misconduct | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Nasty World of forensic dentistry bitemark opinions – Forensic News from the US

The Nasty world of bitemark opinions. At least five cases of forensic lab misconduct in the last 2 years. Some ballistics and trace exams discontinued as “too time consuming.” Most trace is merely associative  (not identifying a specific person or … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, Forensic Science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

#Forensics in Focus : US experts not helping in Mexico Massacre, more forensic inaccuracies in the media …………

New DNA test can specifically identify the difference between identical twins.  Where are the US forensic experts in this? Austrian forensic experts may shed light on Mexico massacre  via @reuters Once more, so much for media accuracy in forensics. Security experts doubt … Continue reading

Posted in ABFO, criminal justice, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Forensic science review : 40 years of assuming “unique dental profiling” now considered unproven – AGAIN

The vagaries of what is “science” is a topic of interest to historians and those in the science business as part of their training. “Scientific advance” is what is expected to be the outcome. An odd variant is when some … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, forensic science reform, Ray Krone bitemark case, Wrongful Conviction | Tagged , | Leave a comment

#Forensics A story about science vs those who pretend science.

This is the case that destroyed the reputation of a forensic method long considered suspect outside the realm of the American Academy of Forensic Science. https://csidds.com/2014/05/01/ray-krones-exoneration-from-bitemark-evidence-the-inside-story-csidds/

Posted in ABFO, Bitemarks, Forensic Science, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Junk Forensic Science Personified in the Media : Most Popular Theme of Forensics in Focus

This blog has arrived at 10,500 hits! Its growth seems to be almost exponential since I started FiF a couple years ago. It can’t be a coincidence that this year’s top theme in FiF (determined by WordPress) has to do … Continue reading

Posted in junk forensic science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

#Forensics and #Crim #Law : Self deluded US Federal courts and Prosecutors still ignore #Junk #Science

There is no better judicial micro-climate than Mississippi to study the self-contradictory and illegitimate misuse of unvalidated forensic opinions in the US. This story describes dubious forensic sciences experts and their untestable methods continuing to be used in courts. No … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, Forensic Science, forensic testimony | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Forensics Canada : When the cops bring in 3 esteemed bitemark experts problems occur. They don’t agree. What’s that tell you?

I can say very little about this child murder case except……I told you so. Plus I’d bet most of these esteemed bitemark folks are on the esteemed bitemark committee for NIST’s Forensic Science Commission. Read about it here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment