Tag Archives: AAFS

FORENSICS | Richardson Bite Mark case exposes ABFO experts’ assurances as folly

Being “tough on crime” is a cliche used by some involved in politics, law enforcement, and used by certain forensic practitioners. I prefer the phrase “smart on crime.”  Both may sound similar, but the “smart” inference means that forensic developments, … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bitemarks, Forensic Science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

FORENSICS | 2013 Is record year for exonerations

Download annual report from…… http://www.innocencenetwork.org/resources/innocence-collateral/network-exoneration-reports/innocence-network-exoneration-report-2013/view

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

DNA vs bite mark believers. Guess which wins?

Add another exoneration to the list of 24 exons and wrongful incarcerations involving AAFS/ABFO/FSAB  forensically “certified” dental bite experts. Read the Innocence Project’s news release.  Read the case list and details of DNA versus bite marks in US criminal courts. … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, Forensic Science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bitemark Forensic Science: who is at fault for 25 cases of bad results?

The backbiting (pun intended) response by the ABFO (a forensic bite mark board recognized by the AAFS) leadership against its own membership (N=108) involved in the 24 cases of erroneous convictions and incarcerations leads everyone to wonder “who are they?”  … Continue reading

Posted in Bite Marks, criminal justice, CSI, expert testimony, Forensic Science | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

FORENSIC TESTIMONY: The “bad apple” history of bitemark cases: FORENSIC SCIENCE

Who are the “bad apples” bite mark experts consider to be the cause of the bad press about their results in court? The answer may surprise you. Pattern matching in forensic science is a major component in criminal investigations. Unfortunately, … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, CSI, Forensic Dentistry, Forensic Science | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Forensic Testimony: Once again, exoneration cases support unreliability of experts trial opinions

Take some time (or more than one visit to get through the information) and follow this link (Forensic Testimony) to a greater understanding on why credibility for some forensic experts is waning or finally being extinguished. The chart posted above … Continue reading

Posted in Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, CSI, Exoneration costs, expert testimony | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Costs of wrongful convictions

The financial connection between wrongful convictions and the costs to taxpayers is a fairly new topic for media discussion. It is rather localized (a $10 million civil award 2013 case from Chicago) in information as nationwide statistics do not appear … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, CSI, Exoneration costs, Forensic Science, prosecutorial misconduct, Wrongful Conviction, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

More on the Hair Analysis Caper: The FBI pulls back from admitting fault

My previous blog on this subject of the joint effort by the FBI, the US Department of Justice (it agrees tolling of statute of limitations on case reviews) and the Innocence Project on hair matching cases contains some interesting politically … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, CSI, Forensic Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment