Forensics: Facial recognition. No talk about accuracy; alot implied about facial algorithms selecting certain “constant” features. #Bertillion

Posted in AAFS, facial recognition, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias | Leave a comment

Forensic retaliation: Coronavirus Russia: Infected forensics expert falls to death brings total count to 3 female doctors dead and one male with brain injuries.

The obvious linkage is their public comments to the press about the pandemic. The one still living was coerced to recant immediately after regaining consciousness. Tragic and classic example of why Trump emulates the Russian totalitarian leader.

Lt Col Natalya Shcherbakova, 45, was put on a life support machine after falling from a window at Moscow State Clinical Hospital but later died, say police sources.
— Read on www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8377329/Russian-forensics-expert-suffering-coronavirus-falls-death-window.html

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime, genocide | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Forensic Pathology: “Excited delerium“ excuse used in MN police restraint death of #GeorgeFloyd

Thurs. May 29, 2020. 6.30 pm PDT.

Today certain “qualified” talking heads in the media have copied the unfounded and rather illogical theory that is used in every police custody restraint death case as a defense. There is a medically noted condition that has been seen in emergency rooms which is associated with severe agitation, sweating, cardiac arythmias, drug use (in some cases), psychological disturbances and sudden death. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3088378/

It is called a “syndrome.” That’s medical talk for a multiple series of symptoms that are considered to characterize a disease. They occur together, but they might not always have a definite cause. A well known forensic pathologist, probably 30 years ago, began to label police custody deaths associated with physical restraint used to subdue an uncooperative detainee as this syndrome. The MN death of Mr. Floyd is wrongly being explained as such, which all adds to the PR of the police defense against their current charges. We are witnessing a forensic mis-diagnosis when you hear its use in the media.

George Floyd showed none of these symptoms. This symptom-less mechanism of death only happens when police are present.

Im not the only one who has seen these preventable tragedies in the media.

Here are some links to how this junk expertise is used to condone police physical abuse and disregard for proper police procedures and human life.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/existence-of-excited-delirium-ruling-in-va-womans-death-has-experts-split/2015/05/06/b1cc9499-ddaa-474c-9e8a-9ae89a9ae679_story.html

How police can prevent what happened to Mr. Floyd. From a police procedural website. Mr. Floyed was killed from……

https://www.policemag.com/524139/how-to-prevent-positional-asphyxia

The federal National Institute of Justice has a four page document on retrainst asphyxia during police custody.

Click to access posasph.pdf

Posted in AAFS, Civil rights, CSI, Excited delerium is bs in custody restraint deaths, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, human rights violations, police custody deaths | Leave a comment

Forensics: False accusers. A public defender in Manhattan says The Central Park video is all too familiar.

An ugly incident between a birdwatcher and dog walker shows there needs to be accountability for playing the privilege card.
— Read on www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/im-a-public-defender-in-manhattan-the-central-park-video-is-all-too-familiar/2020/05/26/73c3de60-9f99-11ea-81bb-c2f70f01034b_story.html

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, CSI, human rights violations, prosecutorial misconduct, Wrongful Conviction | Leave a comment

Forensics: Asylum-seeking women face myriad types of abuse.

The dangers are real. The politicians could care less.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X20300664

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, Forensic Science Bias, human rights violations, prosecutorial misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensics: DAs office in the “lynching” shooting of black man circled their wagons over recent bitemark exoneration

Read about how DAs still think bitemarks are scientific. Sheila Denton’s wrongful conviction came out of the same DA office which for 2 months said that unarmed Arbery’s murder was a “justifiable” shooting of a “suspected criminal.” What utter BS.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/17/ahmaud-arbery-district-attorney-george-barnhill

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bitemarks, CSI, exoneration, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

The Innocence Files season 1, episode 2 recap: The Truth Will Defend Me

Forensics: Episode 2 of Netflix series The Innocence Files looks at the freeing of 2 innocent suspects, faulty bitemark evidence, and a prison with historical links to slavery.
— Read on showsnob.com/2020/05/12/the-innocence-files-season-1-episode-2-recap/

The Bundy dentist’s opinion in the 1979 trial would not be allowed in most US courts today. In those days, and even today in places like India, bitemarks were testified to as being as reliable as fingerprints. Dr. West callls himself a scientist. Beware!

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, CSI, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration | Leave a comment

Forensics: Dangers of Facial Recognition platforms. A study

These programs are not “objective evidence” for police suspicion that you are a crook.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X20300024

Posted in AAFS, Civil rights, CSI, forensic evidence exaggeration, human identification | Leave a comment

Forensics: Corrected link in my last post.

Thanks to all who told me of this. Im doing these posts while completing many honey-do’s. 😎

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forensics: Judge and DA both reject bitemarker expertise. Not the first rodeo for the ABFO dentist and his floundering dental colleagues of the American Academy of Forensic Science.

This judge is very clear that the original prosecutor’s use of a bitemarker’s opinion convicted an innocent woman.

https://www.11alive.com/article/news/investigations/the-reveal/georgia-woman-freed-from-prison-over-flawed-bitemark-evidence/85-88f98a25-4bca-42f2-976b-1119738f1ca8

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, expert testimony, Forensic Dentistry, junk forensic science, Uncategorized | Leave a comment