Category Archives: facial recognition

Forensics: A Dorito bag mistaken for a gun. How AI can lead to false arrests and wrongful convictions

Danger arises when law enforcement believes that AI models are retrieving certainties rather than generating likelihoods. — Read on theconversation.com/how-ai-can-lead-to-false-arrests-and-wrongful-convictions-281102

Posted in Civil rights, Crime, Crime lab scandal, CSI, facial recognition, forensic evidence exaggeration, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Genetic Genealogy case.

http://www.forensicmag.com/3594-All-News/624317-Students-Identify-1986-Jane-Doe-who-was-Never-Reported-Missing/

Posted in Crime, DNA profiling, facial recognition, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: British CSI case. An elderly man frightened to death. Impressive team.

Posted in Crime, DNA profiling, facial recognition, police crime labs | Leave a comment

Forensics: More Junk Cop Forensics. AI Led to Her Wrongful Arrest for Carjacking at 8 Months Pregnant

Police falsely accused Porcha Woodruff of carjacking after misusing facial recognition technology, which experts say has built-in racial biases. — Read on people.com/porcha-woodruff-arrest-ai-facial-recognition-7966714

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, facial recognition, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: When skull measurements considered ethnic superiority. Anténor Firmin challenged anthropology’s racist roots 150 years ago

In The Equality of the Human Races, Haitian scholar Anténor Firmin showed that science did not support division among the races. — Read on http://www.sciencenews.org/article/antenor-firmin-anthropology-racism-haiti

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, facial recognition, Forensic Science Bias, human identification, human rights violations, Medical errors | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Forensics: #NamUS Do you recognize these faces? Help crack the case on these 8 unidentified men found dead in Central Virginia

If these faces look familiar, you may have what it takes to help identify these men found dead in separate locations across Central Virginia as far back as 1988. — Read on http://www.wric.com/news/virginia-news/do-you-recognize-these-faces-help-crack-the-case-on-these-8-unidentified-men-found-dead-in-central-virginia/

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, facial recognition, human identification, missing persons | Leave a comment

Forensics: How a former anthropology student in Ohio led police to identify two men missing for decades – CBS News

A tip, modern technology and a call from a former anthropology student led to the identification of the two men who went missing decades ago. — Read on http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ohio-police-missing-men-cold-cases-youngstown-layette/

Posted in AAFS, DNA profiling, facial recognition, missing persons | Leave a comment

Forensics: The Innocence Projects’ plans for its next 30 years.

innocenceproject.org/in-the-vanguard-of-justice-reform-the-road-ahead/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, exoneration, facial recognition, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Full of false equivalencies. Op-ed claims ‘The face of hysteria: New York must preserve facial recognition as a tool for law enforcement ‘ – New York Daily News

Terrific example of “use it and fix it later.” Ive heard the same about phrenology and bitemarks as recently presented at #AAFS2021. Here is how the NYPD manipulates video evidence. Ridiculous. The op-ed is below these images. The Minneapolis City … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, facial recognition, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic science misconduct, human identification, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Its not facial recognition. We scanned the DNA of 8,000 people to see how facial features are controlled by genes

This is a legitimate first start. Many other loci yet to be studied. This has potential for studying genetic disorders. Phenotyping from DNA is still junk. Like it or not, the facial feature most influenced by your genes is your … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, DNA profiling, facial recognition, junk forensic science | Tagged , | Leave a comment