This judge is very clear that the original prosecutor’s use of a bitemarker’s opinion convicted an innocent woman.
Forensics: Judge and DA both reject bitemarker expertise. Not the first rodeo for the ABFO dentist and his floundering dental colleagues of the American Academy of Forensic Science.
This entry was posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, expert testimony, Forensic Dentistry, junk forensic science, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
FORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends 