National DAs backup DOJ and police control of #Forensic Standards and Practices. #Resist

A very measured PR statement by a DA claiming many good things to come by allowing prosecutors to pick and choose their agendized concepts of forensic standards and practices. This is despite the Innocence Projects continuing to show his brand of forensics and jurisprudence convicts and executes innocents. Forensic failures in his own jurisdiction involve bitemarks, conviction integrity, blood spatter, death investigation protocols, and trace evidence.

” A tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny”

From the District Attorneys

Posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent, forensic testimony, National FOrensic Science Commission | Leave a comment

Stand Strong On Forensic Science Reform – And AGAINST DOJ FAKE NEWS

Image result for stand strong forensics

I have played a bit of poker in my day, but the double-crosses and bluffing we are getting from the our glorious leaders of the Republican Administration is getting old fast.

Their deconstructing and lock-step revision of 10 years of serious accomplishments on forensic science by the bi-partisan players in Obama’s WH, US Congress, and other Criminal Justice stakeholders like the Innocence Projects (25 years strong)  is advancing with speed.

The  USDOJ retrenchment to the days of J Edgar Hoover’s autocratic manipulations and misuse of governmental power is clearly not a smoke and mirror gambit. It is real.  Head prosecutor Sessions is sucking the life out of this 10 years gain. With today’s short and sweet non-renewal of the National Commission on Forensic Science, Sessions is toadying to the strong arm minority within the police crime lab industry and top prosecutors for their ten years of ranting against experiencing scientific (not police ‘science’) oversight to their respective kingdoms.

This post-cancellation DOJ memo makes sure that some lip service of uplifting ideals and goals will be provided within forensics going to this unilateral and very partisan management scheme. Don’t count on it.

For those same 10 years, citizens, coalitions of scientists, hundreds of exonerees, families of the incarcerated, innocence litigators, a few forensic practitioners and so called ‘liberal’ MSM types are largely responsible for making exonerating the innocent and the weaknesses and strengths of forensic science an every day occurrence.

Don’t expect to contribute any comments to the DOJ. Going to http://www.regulations.gov does not result in any link to the memo’s Docket Number OLP 160.

Smoke and Mirrors.

STAND STRONG FOR FORENSIC SCIENCE REFORM

We will not be silenced.

Posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

US Forensics now in charge of Prosecutors

Image result for lock em up

Backsliding from bipartisan input on forensic science reform continues to invest more control to the police and the @NDAA (District Attorneys). These are the same lawyer bunch who think bitemark matching is a jolly good means of human identification.

Washington Post

The ABA Journal indicates that the FBI internal review of its failed hair matching unit will be halted as Sessions’ in house forensic review crew gets setup. The process of getting the FBI to even admit to significant overstatements and validation errors has taken decades and only developed because of DNA wrongful conviction cases revealing the failure of their testimony as to hair ‘driven’ convictions. Here’s just one such case (out of thousands of tainted criminal cases throughout the US) that cost taxpayers #13.2 million.

American Bar Association

Posted in Forensic Science Bias, forensic science reform, forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Leave a comment

Indian and Saudi bitemark experts assume human dentition is unique – Arab Forensic Journal

Image result for orthodontic teeth

These bitemark comparison mini-studies have been around for decades. They generally use a few subjects (in this ‘study” there are 20 biters) who bite into wax, clay, bubble gum etc. The superimposition method used was developed in the 1970’s (a Zerox machine) and 1692 (Salem witch trial bitemark matching). There are two examiners who ‘tested’ the samples for this recently published article.

The authors strongly promote their results for any forensic odontologist based on the premise that, like fingerprint biometrics, all human teeth are unique to each person in the world. They make piddling recognition to limitations affecting any of their assumptions, claims or methods such as: Disagreement in Bitemark Analysis Casework.

Read the full study. (.pdf) Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences and Forensic Medicine

 

Posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

University-based #Forensic Science 50 years of independent crime analysis – Scotland

Forensic Science field exercise. Picture courtesy of Strathclyde University

Strathclyde University’s forensic program began way before DNA showed up in the 80’s and clearly operates untouched by police management of their operations and decision-making.  In the US, the police forensic experts can show up in uniforms or wearing their badges. That surely mixes up police agendas, employment bias and ‘science’ used to reach preconceived theories of guilt. The article is a good short read about SU’s history of ‘working’ cases independently.

Here is the website for the MSc program at U of Strathclyde in Glascow, Scotland. 

Posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

How weakly supported #Forensics goes viral – The media’s responsibility

Emerging hair analysis techniques could reveal vital information about crime suspects, according to professor of Forensic and Investigative Science Glen Jackson from West Virginia University

A glimpse at ‘modern forensics’ and the ‘modern media.’ In this story, we see evidence that various ‘news reporters’ and salaried journalists to the list of people like judges and DAs  need better insight into the scientific method. I am not sure what the ABFO No.2 rule in this pic has to do with the suggested chemical research on hair.

From a short study of 20 people to big page coverage by MSM in a matter of days. Here’s the Daily Mail repeating cutting edge CSI promises to a larger audience.

The entire thread of the journey of chemical hair testing from a small testing lab in WVA to international notice.

The press release 

Growing interest 2 days later

A guest blogger elicits the experimental weaknesses of the original press release and some comments about “peer review” being non-existent. 

Posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

More scientists gang up against the bitemarkers – Oxford University Press -#AAFS2017

Some DAs, some where in the US must have an undergraduate science degree. Please explain these concepts to the @NDAA president Michael Ramos and NY ADA Melissa Mourges and while at it, to some appellate court Justices in Texas soon to rule on the bitemark aided conviction and upcoming September 2017 execution of Kosoul Chanthakoummane.

csidds's avatarFORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends

Image result for lighthouse in the storm

It’s just a dental journal (see pg. 68), but this op-ed piece may be the FIRST time organized dentistry has spoken out about the flim-flam of bitemark ‘science.’ The anonymous author is quietly referencing a recent publication from the Journal of Law and the Biosciences titled “Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims.”  Use this link to access. The JLB journal is a co-venture between Duke University, Harvard University Law School, and Stanford University, and published by Oxford University Press.

From the Journal of the California Dental Association: (Feb 2017)

It’s Time to Stop Using Bite Marks in Forensics, Experts Argue

Researchers are increasingly skeptical about the validity of bitemark identification as trial evidence, according to a paper published in the Journal of Law and the Biosciences. The paper describes the legal basis for the rise of bite-mark identification and reviews relevant empirical research on the subject…

View original post 264 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

From mere suggestion, to simple research, to accurate “forensics” in 2 days – Hair II

@gwynethnotpaltrow talks about the promotion and experimental framework of”Accurate” forensic method of hair chemistry. From her many learned statements, the first is that the tech is not commonly available anywhere in the crime lab environment. Other pertinent observations are spot on.
April 7, 2017 at 2:13 pm
Note that none of this is peer-reviewed yet. Note that “80% accuracy” in sex determination is from a sample size of 10 men and 30 women. I wonder what accuracy they would have gotten by measuring hair length.

I’d love to read the actual details of their technique – but they aren’t available as far as I can tell. They have a n of 40 (20 Jordanian women, 20 US men and women), they measure 15 different compound-specific carbon isotope values, and they look at >>5 parameters (“extensive” questionnaires about diet, hair care and health). There’s no indication how many of the individuals may have been related. You don’t need much statistics background to tell you how many high correlations you can come up with if you measure lots of things on a few individuals.

I find it surprising that they say LC-IRMS is a technique that many technicians can do, and is being more widely used in forensic laboratories. I don’t know of a single forensic laboratory that does this technique. IRMS (Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry) is widely used in academic laboratories, and there is an organization called FIRMS that tries to provide some rudimentary QA/QC to members. However, _LC-IRMS_ is only done at less than ~20 laboratories in the world. Note that the lab that produced these results is not accredited by FIRMS or any other organization.

There’s no confirmation from other researchers, because they haven’t made any details of their research public. Most researchers I know prefer to do press releases when the peer-reviewed paper comes out, so that interested people can find out more – not just when somebody gives a conference talk.

You can try to contribute to their research by registering to provide hair samples at http://glen-jackson.eberly.wvu.edu/nij-hair-project. I registered a few months ago, but haven’t heard anything back yet.

Thanks for your terrific blog!

csidds's avatarFORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends

Image result for body fat cartoon

New Hair Testing Technique Can Accurately Predict a Criminal’s Personal Traits

The time line of promoting forensic research into actual use in criminal investigation seems to be incredibly rapid when reading media reports.

It all started on Tuesday with this referenced press release from the American Chemical Society’s annual meeting about use of exfoliated hair obtained from crime scenes.

This article now takes the chemical analysis of hair’s keratin amino acid structures to the advanced level of being a virtual reality overnight. The researcher claims  gender accuracy at 80% and 90% for determining “body mass.”

This article has more biochemical details to explain what the testing claims to reveal and comments from the WVA researcher. There isn’t anything to  say about getting confirmation from other research teams.

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

From mere suggestion, to simple research, to accurate “forensics” in 2 days – Hair II

Image result for body fat cartoon

New Hair Testing Technique Can Accurately Predict a Criminal’s Personal Traits

The time line of promoting forensic research into actual use in criminal investigation seems to be incredibly rapid when reading media reports.

It all started on Tuesday with this referenced press release from the American Chemical Society’s annual meeting about use of exfoliated hair obtained from crime scenes.

This article now takes the chemical analysis of hair’s keratin amino acid structures to the advanced level of being a virtual reality overnight. The researcher claims  gender accuracy at 80% and 90% for determining “body mass.”

This article has more biochemical details to explain what the testing claims to reveal and comments from the WVA researcher. There isn’t anything to  say about getting confirmation from other research teams.

 

 

Posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Closed DNA chief gets settlement to go away

http://www.kvue.com/news/investigations/defenders/dna-lab-chief-forensic-officer-being-paid-to-resign/429243987

Posted in Crime lab scandal, DNA profiling, Forensic Science | Tagged | 1 Comment