More scientists gang up against the bitemarkers – Oxford University Press -#AAFS2017

Some DAs, some where in the US must have an undergraduate science degree. Please explain these concepts to the @NDAA president Michael Ramos and NY ADA Melissa Mourges and while at it, to some appellate court Justices in Texas soon to rule on the bitemark aided conviction and upcoming September 2017 execution of Kosoul Chanthakoummane.

FORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends

Image result for lighthouse in the storm

It’s just a dental journal (see pg. 68), but this op-ed piece may be the FIRST time organized dentistry has spoken out about the flim-flam of bitemark ‘science.’ The anonymous author is quietly referencing a recent publication from the Journal of Law and the Biosciences titled “Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims.”  Use this link to access. The JLB journal is a co-venture between Duke University, Harvard University Law School, and Stanford University, and published by Oxford University Press.

From the Journal of the California Dental Association: (Feb 2017)

It’s Time to Stop Using Bite Marks in Forensics, Experts Argue

Researchers are increasingly skeptical about the validity of bitemark identification as trial evidence, according to a paper published in the Journal of Law and the Biosciences. The paper describes the legal basis for the rise of bite-mark identification and reviews relevant empirical research on the subject…

View original post 264 more words

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s