Forensics: Perpetuating pseudoscience. Old-School Hair Analysis Is Junk Science. But It Still Keeps People Behind Bars

The technique, developed before DNA testing, can’t definitively tie suspects to crime scenes.Try explaining that to juries — or some judges.
— Read on scheerpost.com/2023/12/30/old-school-hair-analysis-is-junk-science-but-it-still-keeps-people-behind-bars/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, exoneration, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, human identification, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Cheaters in the lab. NYC Medical Examiner reviews 100s of cases in analysts probe

New York City’s Medical Examiner’s office said Friday it is reviewing hundreds of cases in a probe of misconduct by three forensic analysts
— Read on www.nydailynews.com/2023/12/15/nyc-medical-examiners-office-reviewing-hundreds-of-cases-in-budding-lab-scandal/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice, forensic fraud, Forensic Science, forensic science misconduct, US Crime labs | 1 Comment

Forensics: A Trail of Tears. How the Junk Science of Hair Analysis Keeps People Behind Bars – Mother Jones

Each of these cases takes years to litigate and $ defendants don’t possess. The technique, developed before DNA testing, can’t definitively tie suspects to crime scenes. Try explaining that to juries — or some judges.
— Read on www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/12/how-the-junk-science-of-hair-analysis-keeps-people-behind-bars/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, exoneration, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, human rights violations, junk forensic science, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Expert in ancient DNA and wildlife forensics helps identify Oct. 7 massacre victims | The Times of Israel

Hebrew University Prof. Gila Kahila Bar-Gal uses her knowledge of difficult DNA extraction and physical anthropology as she volunteers at Abu Kabir
— Read on www.timesofisrael.com/expert-in-ancient-dna-and-wildlife-forensics-helps-identify-oct-7-massacre-victims/

Posted in AAFS, DNA profiling, Forensic Science, human identification | Leave a comment

Forensics: DNA extraction produces STR markers. The evidential value of dental calculus in the identification process | Scientific Reports

DNA analysis-based identification is by far the gold standard in forensic genetics and it should be performed in every case involving human remains or unidentified bodies. Bones and teeth are the preferred source of human DNA for genetic analysis. However, there are cases where the nature of the proceedings and historical significance prevent the disruption of skeletal structure. The remains may also be heavily degraded. In such situations, forensic geneticists seek alternative sources of human DNA. Teeth calculus has proven to be a viable source of DNA for identification purposes. The aim of this study was to assess the concentration of human DNA in teeth calculus and evaluate the usefulness of teeth calculus as a DNA source in the identification process. Teeth calculus was collected from skeletons exhumed between 2021 and 2022 by the PBGOT (Polish Genetic Database of Victims of Totalitarianism) team from the former Stalag IID prisoner-of-war camp in Stargard. Genetic analyses included the determination of autosomal and Y-STR markers. The total concentration of human DNA was also evaluated in samples from teeth calculus and teeth taken from the same individuals. The pilot study included 22 skeletons with a sufficient amount of calculus for isolation (specified in the protocol). Samples were taken from the largest areas of calculus deposited on lingual surfaces of mandibular incisors. The prepared samples underwent DNA extraction. Our study demonstrated that teeth calculus is a source of human DNA for remains from the World War II period. The obtained DNA concentration allowed for the determination of STR markers. It was shown that teeth calculus contains human DNA in an amount suitable for preliminary identification analyses.
— Read on www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-48761-7

Posted in DNA profiling, Forensic Dentistry, Forensic Science, human identification | Leave a comment

Forensics: Getting rid of bitemark believers. Updated Evidence Rule Warns Judges Against Junk Science

Changes to a new federal rule of evidence will go into effect on Friday, reminding judges that they should be extra vigilant about not allowing “junk science” from expert witnesses to reach juries.
— Read on news.bloomberglaw.com/employee-benefits/updated-evidence-rule-warns-judges-against-junk-science

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: 44 exoneration cases involving bitemark opinions had a 77% error rate. The Impact of False or Misleading Forensic Evidence on Wrongful Convictions | National Institute of Justice

Wrongful conviction, or the conviction of a person for a crime that they did not commit, is one of the greatest travesties of the criminal justice system. As of 2023, The National Registry of Exonerations has recorded over 3,000 cases of wrongful convictions in the United States.[1] Organizations such as The Innocence Project work to free the innocent and prevent these convictions, so far exonerating 375 people, including 21 who served on death row.
— Read on nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/impact-false-or-misleading-forensic-evidence-wrongful-convictions

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, exoneration, Exoneration costs, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Ray Krone bitemark case, William Richards Exoneration Case | Leave a comment

Forensics: Unfair Ballistics examiners wrongly describe some results, Iowa State profs say

When ballistics experts say a match between 2 bullet casings is ‘inconclusive,’ it nearly always means a non-match, a result that could help defendants
— Read on www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2023/11/27/forensic-ballistics-examiners-results-questioned-in-isu-research-iowa-state-evidence-crime-scene/71584697007/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, exoneration, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensics: Stolen genetics. 23andMe data theft prompts DNA testing companies to switch on 2FA by default

The move to improve user account security comes after a hacker claimed the theft of millions of 23andMe user records data.
— Read on techcrunch.com/2023/11/07/23andme-ancestry-myheritage-two-factor-by-default/

Posted in DNA profiling, forensic science misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensics: Right to ‘bodily autonomy’ upheld. ‘Disproven and unsupportable’: Kansas judge blocks junk science abortion restrictions – Kansas Reflector

A Kansas judge blocked several long-standing and newly-implemented abortion restrictions in the state on Monday.
— Read on kansasreflector.com/2023/10/30/disproven-and-unsupportable-kansas-judge-blocks-junk-science-abortion-restrictions/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, Forensic Science Bias, human rights violations, junk forensic science | Leave a comment