Category Archives: junk forensic science

Forensics: Commission refers the 1998 murder conviction of Justin Plummer to the Court of Appeal due to bitemark expert

Its a prime example of a dentist testimony exceeding the limits of scientific knowledge. These guys are always “very convincing.” Commission refers the murder conviction of Justin Plummer to the Court of Appeal | Criminal Cases Review Commission — Read … Continue reading →

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: How a Sharp-Eyed Scientist Became Biology’s Image Detective | The New Yorker

Using just her eyes and memory, Elisabeth Bik has single-handedly identified thousands of studies containing potentially doctored scientific images. — Read on http://www.newyorker.com/science/elements/how-a-sharp-eyed-scientist-became-biologys-image-detective

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Crime lab scandal, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, US homicide statistics analysis | Leave a comment

Forensics: A demand to U of Texas to halt faculty from doing “illegal” dental ageing reports for US immigration cases. #junk#forensic#science

innocenceproject.org/innocence-project-demands-university-stop-use-of-dental-age-estimation/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Anthro calling BS on ICE using dental xrays to put immigrant kids into adult detention. @theNAME1966

These US dentists are trained to do this by the American Board of Forensic Odontology. They mislead the courts and care less about ICE using their “conclusions.” medicalxpress.com/news/2018-06-immigration-agents-x-raying-migrants-age.html

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct, human identification, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: 40 hour course qualifies to do BPA. Study on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis Finds ‘Conclusions Were Often Erroneous’

Study on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis Finds ‘Conclusions Were Often Erroneous’ – Reason.com — Read on reason.com/2021/06/11/study-on-bloodstain-pattern-analysis-finds-conclusions-were-often-erroneous/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Error at NYPD lab that went unchecked for 5 years warrants probe

Police say “no harm no foul.” Defense say false drug testing needs an audit. Terri Rosenblatt, the supervising attorney of the New York Legal Aid Society’s DNA unit, said in a statement that they looking closely at the error. — … Continue reading →

Posted in AAFS, Crime lab scandal, Forensic Science, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, US Crime labs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Latest bitemark wrongful conviction: Eddie Lee Howard

Wrongful Conviction with Jason Flom – Eddie Lee Howard  https://www.wrongfulconvictionpodcast.com/podcast/s12e58-wrongful-conviction-with-jason-flom-eddie-lee-howard

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, Forensic Dentistry, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics Australia: “Triad” absolutists vs lack of scientific data. Critique of baby shaking prosecutions raises troubling response

Forensic science practices and methodologies should not be allowed to continue without a rigorous independent review. — Read on http://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/critique-of-baby-shaking-prosecutions-raises-troubling-response-20210523-p57ubw.html

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice reform, CSI, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Wrongful Conviction | Leave a comment

Forensics. Scientist Faces Legal threats and police searches: Debate explodes over baby shaking science

Forensic Science progress is personally and professionally risky. Waney Squire MD had similar retribution in the UK. Legal threats and police searches: Debate explodes over baby shaking science — Read on amp.theage.com.au/national/victoria/legal-threats-and-police-searches-debate-explodes-over-baby-shaking-science-20210513-p57rkp.html

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Forensics Australia: Review of ‘junk’ forensic science in courts abandoned

More proof that in general, politics, government, and forensic science improvement are incompatible partners. Complaints about confused juries, junk science and possible miscarriages of justice prompted an investigation into forensic science, which has been shelved. — Read on http://www.smh.com.au/national/review-of-junk-forensic-science-in-courts-abandoned-20210520-p57thx.html

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice reform, CSI, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science | Leave a comment