Forensics Australia: “Triad” absolutists vs lack of scientific data. Critique of baby shaking prosecutions raises troubling response

Posted on May 25, 2021 by csidds

Forensic science practices and methodologies should not be allowed to continue without a rigorous independent review.
— Read on www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/critique-of-baby-shaking-prosecutions-raises-troubling-response-20210523-p57ubw.html

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS, criminal justice reform, CSI, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Wrongful Conviction. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply