Tag Archives: Forensic science

Narrative on forensics NAS/PCAST vs the world of law enforcement

This look hits most of the highs and lows of contentious statements from law enforcement after the President’s Council took on their established police forensic turf. It does mention wrongful convictions stemming from overrated forensic ‘science’ which seemed left out … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, CSI | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Once again its kitty litter that’s putting citizens in jail

So-called field ‘testing’ of suspicious substances by police runs afoul of their false positives. As Loretta Lynch said, “all is well in criminal justice” right? If appointed Jeff Beauregard Sessions will surely double up on that one. Kitty litter. Krispy … Continue reading

Posted in Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Another ridiculous bitemark case emerges into public view after 30+ years

The evidence: I’m assisting in two other cases attempting to eradicate junk science within criminal courts. This third case is an example of similar arguments during an adversarial hearing combining attempts to test new DNA evidence and publish research debunking … Continue reading

Posted in Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, DNA profiling | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Touch DNA: “In the eye of the beholder” leads to conflicting interpretations

Pretty good over-view on “secondary transference” of epithelial cells being used in criminal cases that some deny happens and others use as a defense strategy. Clearly, it’s all in the “eye” of prosecutors and police. Michelle Mankin’s blog. Plus a … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice, forensic science reform | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

2016 Top Ten Forensic Science Posts

The year’s most read posts from Forensics in Focus. Happy New Year. What is a partial forensic DNA “match”? Obstinate DA pursues new trial in William Richards’ case. PCAST: Forensic science reform gets knee-jerk backlash from law enforcement. Top 9 … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice reform, CSI, Dr. Michael West, exoneration, Forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Disproportionate number of minorities in DNA databases misdirects cases

Here is a lede from the New York Legal Aid Society about the slowly trending use of racially skewed DNA bases being LEO searched for relatives of suspects. (More news below). The limitations of familial DNA also made headlines in … Continue reading

Posted in DNA profiling, Forensic Science | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Natl Institute of Standards and Tech, praising advances in DNA, leaves out bitemark rejection

NIST is the uber-arm of science in the world of the federal government and has a wide view on most things in our physical world. Its holiday post reflects on 2016’s triumphs and removal of some obsolete methods in forensics … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice reform, CSI, forensic science reform | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

When flies besmirch the crime scene, this might avoid DNA mistakes

Interesting look at separating fly DNA from human DNA at a messy crime scene. Hopefully the fly crap can be separated out after the research is completed. There are cases where flyspecks (regurg and poop) are mis-identified as blood spatter and … Continue reading

Posted in DNA mixtures, Forensic Science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Top Ten Forensic Articles in Dec 2016 for @CSIDDS

Looking back on the most popular articles published this month in Forensics in Focus. Thank you all for following!! The $2 drug tests are great for law enforcement drug warriors, but not much goo for anyone else. Utter silence from … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice reform, CSI, forensic science reform | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Forensics: Making sure your employer get paid regardless…….

An insider look about genetic ‘counselors’ selling imperfect testing services and exaggerating results in order to stay employed. Hmm, the same might be said for police using junk drug testing kits from Kmart.  https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/03/05/when-baby-due-genetic-counselors-seen-downplaying-false-alarms/bBC0KAFVidJASkkOiMg6DI/story.html

Posted in forensic fraud, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment