innocenceproject.org/innocence-project-demands-university-stop-use-of-dental-age-estimation/
Latest News on Forensic Science and Criminal Law
-
Join 223 other subscribers
Of course the 2 dentists are ABFO members.
csidds.com/2015/08/19/the-case-of-the-recaptured-bitemark-showing-how-judges-get-bamboozled/
These US dentists are trained to do this by the American Board of Forensic Odontology. They mislead the courts and care less about ICE using their “conclusions.”
medicalxpress.com/news/2018-06-immigration-agents-x-raying-migrants-age.html
Defending itself against allegations of “fraudulent behavior” that led to the loss of its accreditation, D.C.’s embattled crime lab said it never deliberately concealed any information from its accrediting board.
— Read on wtop.com/dc/2021/06/documents-dc-crime-lab-says-it-never-concealed-findings/
Study on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis Finds ‘Conclusions Were Often Erroneous’ – Reason.com
— Read on reason.com/2021/06/11/study-on-bloodstain-pattern-analysis-finds-conclusions-were-often-erroneous/
DC Politicos are whitewashing these issues.
The Department of Forensic Sciences needs oversight and new leadership committed to scientific integrity.
— Read on www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/06/11/dc-crime-lab-disaster-council-bowser/
Of course, US courts mostly allow the probabilistic interpretation of DNA mixtures such as STRmix. Typical when commercially developed methods go straight into crime labs then into the justice system which are generally unprepared to eval their foundation versus user assertions of accuracy.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has published
— Read on www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2021/06/nist-publishes-review-dna-mixture-interpretation-methods
Error rates and disagreement between examiners.
Accuracy and Reproducibility of Conclusions by Forensic Bloodstain Pattern Analysts – ScienceDirect
— Read on www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073821001766