Category Archives: junk forensic science

Forensics: The long road for exonorees demanding compensation for years in prison. Oregon AG denies 40 innocence claims.

Posted on February 18, 2025 by csidds

https://www.opb.org/article/2025/02/18/oregon-wrongful-convictions-bipartisan-bill-exonerated-exoneree-crime-justice/

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, human rights violations, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: 🧪 Police misconduct settlements reaches $107.5M in 2024. Taxpayers on the hook for it.

Posted on February 16, 2025 by csidds

https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_94595428-eb22-11ef-8a89-d388139ed6ad.html

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, human rights violations, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: The medical dystopian nightmare of the tin-hat icon and crank RFKjr

Posted on January 29, 2025 by csidds

https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-junk-science-of-robert-f-kennedy-jr

Posted in Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Massive police crime lab scandal in Colorado. Faked DNA results affects hundreds of cases.

Posted on January 25, 2025 by csidds

https://washingtonpost.com/nation/2025/01/23/dna-test-fraud-colorado/

Posted in ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice, Exoneration costs, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform protecting the innocence, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Police profiling methos debunked by DNA.

Posted on January 20, 2025 by csidds

Another example of junk Cop forensics and assumptions concerning criminal behavior. https://www.jezebel.com/how-rape-kits-debunked-junk-science-like-behavioral-profiling

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, DNA profiling, junk forensic science, US Crime labs | Leave a comment

Forensics: Are police actual ‘drug experts’ ? It’s junk science.’ Michigan court case sets precedent for so-called drug ‘experts’

Posted on October 30, 2024 by csidds

‘It’s junk science.’ Michigan court case sets precedent for so-called drug ‘experts’ – mlive.com — Read on http://www.mlive.com/news/2024/10/its-junk-science-michigan-court-case-sets-precedent-for-so-called-drug-experts.html

Posted in costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, Forensic Science, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Legal bullet expert doubts state’s bullet evidence against Richard Allen. Tech did not record negative results and did not test multiple weapons taken from double murder crime scene.

Posted on October 26, 2024 by csidds

CARROLL COUNTY, Ind. — The only piece of hard evidence presented before jurors in the Richard Allen double murder trial in Delphi that supposedly directly ties the defendant to the killings of Abby Williams and Libby German in 2017 is … Continue reading →

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, forensic testimony, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Incompetent hair analysis led to 8 executions and hundreds of convictions. Virginia Crime Commission recommends deeper review of Mary Jane Burton’s work | VPM

Posted on October 25, 2024 by csidds

A panel of experts could determine if “pattern of misconduct” occurred. — Read on http://www.vpm.org/news/2024-10-24/mary-jane-burton-admissible-scott-surovell-virginia-dna-testing

Posted in ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, death penalty, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | 2 Comments

Forensics: More worthless studies on gender IDs from lip prints and tongue shapes. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

Posted on October 20, 2024 by csidds

My critiques of bitemarks and similar pseudoscience practitioners got me banned from LinkedIn, the editorial board of the J of Forensics Sciences, and working for the US Department of Justice. How’s that for the “cancel culture” inside forensic science? My … Continue reading →

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: ‘Shaken baby” myth condemned him. Texas junk science law reason for temporary stay in death row execution

Posted on October 19, 2024 by csidds

Robert Roberson, the first person scheduled to be executed over “shaken baby syndrome” in the death of his daughter, won a stay of execution in Texas. — Read on http://www.newsnationnow.com/cuomo-show/texas-junk-science-law-reason-for-temporary-stay-of-execution/

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, human rights violations, junk forensic science | Leave a comment