Author Archives: csidds

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.

Judge tosses out two types of DNA evidence used regularly in criminal cases

Judge tosses out two types of DNA evidence used regularly in criminal cases – Forensics in Focus EXCLUSIVE: Justice Mark Dwyer has ditched the results of low copy number DNA testing and Forensic Statistical Tool from the cases of Andrew … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice, expert testimony, Forensic Science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Junk Forensic Science Shows Up at the 2015 American Academy of Forensic Sciences Meeting – Again

Forensic science fails in specific controversial areas of wherein “classic” investigation methods, never brought forth by the scientific method, are still posing as “business as usual.”. Think of the “matches” you hear about on TV.  Ignore DNA and Toxicology. This is … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, Forensic Science, forensic science reform, junk forensic science, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

2014 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2014 annual report for this blog. Here's an excerpt: The concert hall at the Sydney Opera House holds 2,700 people. This blog was viewed about 9,200 times in 2014. If it were a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

New strategy in exoneration litigation: The Nullification of Innocence

Nothing is ever over in exoneration litigation, be it from exonerees’ difficulties in re-entering society, or when some DAs and police, with help from their lawyers, continue to chase after the men and women who have wrongfully endured imprisonment from … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bitemarks, criminal justice, Exoneration costs, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Illinois police dept and experts’ defense theory attempts to thwart legally innocent man’s compensation suit.

Let nothing surprise you when lawyers are involved in opposing  litigation involving wrongful conviction disputes. There is a civil case in Illinois, that has an exonerated man, Bennie Starks, suing the Waukegan police department and their 2 member panel of … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, Exoneration costs | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Another Shaken Baby Syndrome Acquittal

Originally posted on Wrongful Convictions Blog:
An Iowa District Judge has dismissed the case against Peter Ranke, who was accused of injuring his 3-week old baby by shaking.  And further, the judge sharply criticized the diagnosing doctor for mishandling the investigation…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Worst miscarriages of justice in British law from grossly misleading forensic science” – Scotland

“Some of the worst miscarriages of justice in British legal history have come from cases in which the forensic science was later shown to have been grossly misleading.” Media Hype Typical second-hand and incorrect quotation regarding a Science article on … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice | Tagged | Leave a comment

US Exonerations at a Record High; Cost of one wrongful conviction from 1992 is $4.75 million while others go without

The continuing end game for the people erroneously convicted (usually for homicide) and released after decades in prison continues to be clouded. One man in New York gets $4.75 million.  NYC paid another man $10 million in April, 2014. US exonerations … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

More on the CSI myth in forensic science

The case described in the first link is Gerard Richardson, not Henderson. I have written past articles on his conviction aided via a small cadre of bitemark experts. The second link is today’s op-ed from the Huff Post about similar … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, exoneration, Forensic Science, junk forensic science | Tagged , | 1 Comment

New Australian law on “new” forensic evidence releases man after 20rs in prison

Forensic opine by Patholgist at 1995 conviction appears to have been mere theory. Does that sound familiar? Unlike California Supreme Court’s recent pathetic statement that opinions on forensic evidence is “not true or false.” What a dumb legal basis to … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice, Forensic Science, forensic science reform, William Richards Exoneration Case | Tagged | Leave a comment