Author Archives: csidds

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.

Forensics: The White House Office of Sci Tech investigates Bitemark Believers on Jan 15

Originally posted on FORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends:
? ? The Obama Administration offers a potpourri of forensic practitioners at a public hearing scheduled for  Jan 15th. Among them is one of the pro bitemark witnesses who…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forensic lab autonomy in Mexico way ahead of US counterpart labs managed by police

Police have no jurisdiction in Mexican forensic science laboratories and investigations. DNA crime scene collection is done by civilian investigators. Fascinating. My county has made at least four attempts, in the last 30+ years, to put the Ventura County ME’s office … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, CSI | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Read the Manhattan DAs total nonsense regarding forensic science reform

Here is the correct linkage to Manhattan ADAs Mourges ( a link to some more of her shenanigans) and Robert Ferrari’s flaming rhetoric and bile about why bitemark matchers are as good as fingerprints in identifying suspects of crime. I suppose … Continue reading

Posted in criminal justice reform, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Michigan crime lab gets slammed ( those damned defense attys) for faking it for $$

Here we go again. Seems that these Mich State crime lab guys, prosecutors and the cops might be incentivising each other to boost felony convictions and their own coffers. “What recently uncovered emails reveal is that the AG’s office, the … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Forensics: The White House Office of Sci Tech investigates Bitemark Believers on Jan 15

    The Obama Administration offers a potpourri of forensic practitioners at a public hearing scheduled for  Jan 15th. Among them is one of the pro bitemark witnesses who pled for mercy before the Texas For Sci Commission a month ago. Here is … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, CSI | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Forensics in Thailand shows an ugly lack of fairness in Aussie double murder case.

Here’s another case where human rights and so-called use of  “forensic science”  have little in common. A notable Thai forensic expert denounces the forensic “proof” left unavailable to defendants’ lawyers in this murder of two Australian tourists. Politics ran away … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Civil rights, human rights violations | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Bitemarks linked to child abuse arrest

(Note: Regardless of all the digital artwork,  measurements seen in this case are not accurate for biter “matching”) The prevalance of bitemark injuries brought forth  in child abuse investigations and prosecutions has never been disputed but they have been as … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bitemarks | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Flap over showing medical students plane crash photos from MH17

A Dutch medical and forensic professor got slammed by some bureaucrat for lecturing students with the aid of the Malaysia Air plane crash victims’ remains. Apparently some journalists snuck into his professional presentation. The main issue regarding post or ante … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Fire Science course in TX used to “fine-tune” arson protocols in light of Willingham case.

I’m sure John Lentini, at http://firescientist.com/, who has helped create major changes in arson evidence interpretation throughout the US, has some comments to add on this subject of “human case” analysis advances with fire investigators. http://www.firehouse.com/article/12146450/fatal-fire-investigations-forensic-fire-death-class-in-texas

Posted in AAFS | Leave a comment

How a DA used an “inconclusive” DNA result to imply it supported the victim’s testimony

No one ever denies that criminal trials are merely a war of words supporting implications of guilt or innocence. The experts were not at the crime scene, and neither was the jury nor the judge. That’s what makes victim visual … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment