When you have no scientific proofs to contradict years of unreliable expert testimony and false forensic education on the subject, this speaker just blames everyone but himself. He doesn’t dare answer the scientific inquiries of this White House panel on Forensic Science last Friday. He laments how the public “good” will be damaged by not believing his flammery. Sorry, I mean, his opinions as a “non-academic” will save lives. Right?
This blog article by Professor Iain Pretty, from the UK, explains how practitioners of unreliable forensic opinions can be likened to fraudulent medical practitioners who kill people in the operating room.