Author Archives: csidds

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.

Ad Hoc Forensic “research’ by FBI reveals how junk gets into court – #MakingAMurder

FOUR EXPERTS EXPLAIN WHY FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF CRIME SCENES IS NOT AS RELIABLE AS YOU MIGHT THINK The deep media and the public’s viral response to Steven Avery’s multiple convictions for murder has developed some valuable insight into the lengths … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Forensics: The role of social media as a watchdog on abuse of power and and imperfect science

I have significant experience listening (especially at the last AAFS meeting) and reading snide comments from mostly volunteering participants (commonly defensive) in the “forensic science reform” debate demeaning the “blog” aspect of journalistic reporting. My vocal response at the AAFS … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, CSI, Forensic Science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Ukrainian chief forensic expert shot in retaliation for MH 17 recovery efforts

Chilling news. A suspect has been arrested. http://www.inquisitr.com/2987484/suspect-arrested-over-attempted-assassination-of-chief-forensic-expert-in-mh17-crash-investigation/

Posted in Forensic Science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Junk forensic science appeals largely hit a dead end because of appeal exhaustion.

Individuals convicted largely due to junk science face challenges finding legal remedies In the wake of last year’s FBI hair analysis error scandal, Arkansas defense attorneys are asking the state supreme court to grant clients convicted by the junk science … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Harward’s exoneration from a 33 year old bitemark conviction brings out comments from DA expert.

“In a statement, Levine said he was upset and disturbed at the result, given that the case produced wide agreement among examiners who had access to more information than is often available. “This case should persuade all my colleagues to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

TX and CA: How Prosecutors ignore the effects of junk forensic science on their convictions.

CSI forensics seems to be infallible on TV. Not as much in the real world. Try reading”Bitten by Experts” from Jordan Smith at The Intercept. Its all about the junk. In the same vein, this article gives a closeup on where the … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, CSI | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

UK Forensic Witchhunt: Cops targeted Waney Squier for money?

  2011 journalist reporting from the UK’s Daily Mail brought me up to date with the ad hominem pillorying brought against paediatric neuropathology physician Waney Squier over the last decade. Plus there are a few more newsworthy facts. Squier was recently … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forensic Error Rates: This is Scary about FBI facial recog database: 20% error rate

The article says the feds 547 million foto archive has had some successes. This writer throws this out this tidbit about facial “uniqueness.” Hope the feds have your portrait quality snaps. Some testing, however, indicates the fed system has a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Thrifty Scot government looking for new customers for its spanking new crime lab

Taking a look at next year’s budget, and a $75M crime lab investment, the Scottish police chiefs are looking to offer their forensic services to other jurisdictions and customers. https://www.holyrood.com/articles/news/police-chiefs-keen-share-forensic-services-other-agencies-boost-income

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“Those damn bite marks, if his parents had just got him orthodontia he wouldn’t be in this predicament.”

Defense attorney from 1986 murder trial says bite-mark evidence was persuasive to jury. Both prosecution bitemark experts belonged to the ABFO. The defense bitemark expert believed that the method was real “science.” http://www.richmond.com/news/article_e87446cc-3e5e-51b2-99fd-bdbb963b8ee3.html#.VwVIf_NKQ7o.twitter  

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment