Category Archives: Uncategorized

Steven Avery: Close Look at DNA testing and re-testing and non-testing for @ZellnerLaw

Social media is never a good place to divine what’s happening fact-wise in “Making A Murderer” (or in any forensic case for that matter) but here is a collection of the latest. Claims about what the DNA testing list agreed … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Bu****it info to Young Forensic Scientists about bitemarks – AAFS

This is a current AAFS educational profile talking about disciplines within forensic “science.” It is in the “choosing a career in forensic science” section and amongst other activities, explains “scientist-dentists” role in performing bitemark identification analysis. It seems the AAFS hasn’t put … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Calling current forensics “error prone” includes mixture DNA evidence

Law professor David Kaye and statistical science blogger  sums things up nicely: Analyzing mixtures of DNA is “not like a Ouija board — it’s not junk science in that sense,” said David Kaye, a law professor at Penn State University and author … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Testing the crime lab testers comes to Houston’s crime lab

I’m not surprised that police crime labs generally avoid stringent internal evals of its personnel. I know of one “blinded” bitemark study, a means of catching perpetrators of crime concept accepted by US District Attorneys.  It involved a notorious dentist … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

More legal argument pro and con to TrueAllele reliability and peer review

Who sets the standards for admissibility of science in courts is the core issue. The history of science in courts contains rules (Frye, Daubert, Kunho) talking about the need for peer review. In one telling remark, the DA in this … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Chummy crime labber gets close scrutiny.

Not exactly PC in today’s hyper sensitive awareness of cognitive bias in police crime lab environments   http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2016/11/19/do-thank-you-notes-hint-at-impropriety.html

Posted in criminal justice reform, CSI, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bogus video height estimate gets the attention of the TxForensic Sci Commission

Having done some digital comparisons over the last 15 years, mis-sizing objects seen in fotos is real popular with bitemark experts all the time. Here’s a story about a DA having his “expert” botch a pic of someone 5’6″ into … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Flat-earth concepts of Shaken Baby Syndrome shaken by US judge

For the first time, a New York appellate court has ruled that evidence once used to convict people in shaken-baby cases may no longer be scientifically valid. http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2016/11/16/ruling-alters-legal-landscape-ny-shaken-baby-cases/93952304/ ► Shaken-baby science questioned ► Changing science a tough sell in court UK … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Supreme Judicial Court questions whether to provide a blanket dismissal to the 24,000 convictions in which Dookhan was involved

The arguments about legal “inconvenience” versus “tainted” forensic evidence versus “unsafe convictions” brings us to the real uncertainties about the definition of justice. Letting the DAs decide is incredibly wrong.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Non-unanimous jury verdict of death and junk science at SCOTUS

Petition for Certiorari to SCOTUS: Sireci v. Florida Issue(s): Whether a state court violates a petitioner’s federal due process rights when it denies a new trial and DNA testing in an actual innocence case in which newly discovered evidence demonstrates … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment