Testing the crime lab testers comes to Houston’s crime lab

Image result for double blinded crime lab

I’m not surprised that police crime labs generally avoid stringent internal evals of its personnel. I know of one “blinded” bitemark study, a means of catching perpetrators of crime concept accepted by US District Attorneys.  It involved a notorious dentist named West who flunked the outcome (thinking it was a real case) when his opinions came out horribly wrong. 

The crime lab certifiers (ASCLD) don’t require blind testing. Crime labbers avoiding contact with law enforcement before testing evidence would also be a big help. This lady crime tech is getting slammed for her chuminess. 

Onto Houston………

“Under HFSC’s blind testing program analysts in five sections do not know whether they are performing real casework or simply taking a test. The test materials are introduced into the workflow and arrive at the laboratory in the same manner as all other evidence and casework.”

This article was put written by the Houston crime lab. 

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s