Category Archives: junk forensic science

Forensics: 40 hour course qualifies to do BPA. Study on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis Finds ‘Conclusions Were Often Erroneous’

Study on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis Finds ‘Conclusions Were Often Erroneous’ – Reason.com — Read on reason.com/2021/06/11/study-on-bloodstain-pattern-analysis-finds-conclusions-were-often-erroneous/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Error at NYPD lab that went unchecked for 5 years warrants probe

Police say “no harm no foul.” Defense say false drug testing needs an audit. Terri Rosenblatt, the supervising attorney of the New York Legal Aid Society’s DNA unit, said in a statement that they looking closely at the error. — … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Crime lab scandal, Forensic Science, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, US Crime labs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Latest bitemark wrongful conviction: Eddie Lee Howard

Wrongful Conviction with Jason Flom – Eddie Lee Howard  https://www.wrongfulconvictionpodcast.com/podcast/s12e58-wrongful-conviction-with-jason-flom-eddie-lee-howard

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, Forensic Dentistry, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics Australia: “Triad” absolutists vs lack of scientific data. Critique of baby shaking prosecutions raises troubling response

Forensic science practices and methodologies should not be allowed to continue without a rigorous independent review. — Read on http://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/critique-of-baby-shaking-prosecutions-raises-troubling-response-20210523-p57ubw.html

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice reform, CSI, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Wrongful Conviction | Leave a comment

Forensics. Scientist Faces Legal threats and police searches: Debate explodes over baby shaking science

Forensic Science progress is personally and professionally risky. Waney Squire MD had similar retribution in the UK. Legal threats and police searches: Debate explodes over baby shaking science — Read on amp.theage.com.au/national/victoria/legal-threats-and-police-searches-debate-explodes-over-baby-shaking-science-20210513-p57rkp.html

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Forensics Australia: Review of ‘junk’ forensic science in courts abandoned

More proof that in general, politics, government, and forensic science improvement are incompatible partners. Complaints about confused juries, junk science and possible miscarriages of justice prompted an investigation into forensic science, which has been shelved. — Read on http://www.smh.com.au/national/review-of-junk-forensic-science-in-courts-abandoned-20210520-p57thx.html

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice reform, CSI, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: AAFS 2012 meeting abstract on the failure of bitemark analysis

This one got me no love from the ABFO bitemarkers.

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Uncategorized, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Staggering number of cases affected. The Massachusetts crime lab scandal is just the beginning.

In Massachusetts, it will take years to unravel the scope of such systemic errors. — Read on slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/05/massachusetts-crime-lab-houston-forensic-science.html

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, CSI, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: How junk “research” enters mainstream academia. External Qi – Science Integrity Digest

External Qi – Science Integrity Digest — Read on scienceintegritydigest.com/2019/05/24/external-qi/amp/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Medical errors | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Forensics: Tools – How do you know a paper is legit?

I am hoping this review is helpful. Hearing about unpublished opinions on YouTube is driving me crazy. Students need to read this quick overview. Tools – How do you know a paper is legit? — Read on http://www.callingbullshit.org/tools/tools_legit.html

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bitemarks, Forensic Science, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform protecting the innocent, junk forensic science | Leave a comment