Category Archives: Forensic Science Bias

Forensics: How forensic dentists ruin innocent lives

I have co-existed with these dentists for decades. Some are sincere and thoughtful. Others are raging egotists. None are trained as a “scientist .” The outrageous cases like McCrory’s (see the link below) over the last 2 decades have led … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, death penalty, DNA profiling, Exoneration costs, expert testimony, forensic fraud, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform, forensic science reform protecting the innocence, forensic testimony, human rights violations, junk forensic science, missing persons, namus, Ray Krone bitemark case, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Wrap this up and show to all the bitemarkers lecturing at the #AAFS mtg next month. AI discovers that not every fingerprint is unique. EurekAlert!

AI discovers that not every fingerprint is un | EurekAlert! — Read on http://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1030475

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, human identification, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: 44 exoneration cases involving bitemark opinions had a 77% error rate. The Impact of False or Misleading Forensic Evidence on Wrongful Convictions | National Institute of Justice

Wrongful conviction, or the conviction of a person for a crime that they did not commit, is one of the greatest travesties of the criminal justice system. As of 2023, The National Registry of Exonerations has recorded over 3,000 cases … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, exoneration, Exoneration costs, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Ray Krone bitemark case, William Richards Exoneration Case | Leave a comment

Forensics: Unfair Ballistics examiners wrongly describe some results, Iowa State profs say

When ballistics experts say a match between 2 bullet casings is ‘inconclusive,’ it nearly always means a non-match, a result that could help defendants — Read on http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2023/11/27/forensic-ballistics-examiners-results-questioned-in-isu-research-iowa-state-evidence-crime-scene/71584697007/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, exoneration, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensics: Right to ‘bodily autonomy’ upheld. ‘Disproven and unsupportable’: Kansas judge blocks junk science abortion restrictions – Kansas Reflector

A Kansas judge blocked several long-standing and newly-implemented abortion restrictions in the state on Monday. — Read on kansasreflector.com/2023/10/30/disproven-and-unsupportable-kansas-judge-blocks-junk-science-abortion-restrictions/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, Forensic Science Bias, human rights violations, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: A medieval test in use. “Unreliable” Lung Float Test Still Being Used to Convict Women of Murder — ProPublica

The “lung float” test claims to help determine if a baby was born alive or dead, but many medical examiners say it’s too unreliable. Yet the test is still being used to bring murder charges — and get convictions. — … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, Forensic Science Bias, post mortem interval | Leave a comment

Forensic bias: Telling us less than what they know: Expert inconclusive reports conceal exculpatory evidence in forensic cartridge-case comparisons.

APA PsycNet DoiLanding page — Read on psycnet.apa.org/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, Exoneration costs, forensic fraud, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensics: Koehler, Mnookin and Saks on The scientific reinvention of forensic science. Bitemarks NOT reinvented in their analysis. Ask the #AAFS why this has NOT happened.

Forensic science is undergoing an evolution in which a long-standing “trust the examiner” focus is being replaced by a “trust the scientific method… — Read on http://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2301840120

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: When religion and “science” mix the courts cant figure it out. Trans kids pay the price.

http://www.huffpost.com/entry/paid-experts-defending-anti-trans-law_n_65021a7ee4b01df7c3b6d513

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, Medical errors, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forensics: Civil Judges get it. But criminal courts still allow bitemarks. Junk Science in the Courtroom Keeps Coming Back – and Getting Swatted

There’s something about autism that invites scapegoating. The latest attack was on makers of Lexapro, the anti-depressant medication, when used during pregnancy. Six plaintiffs recruited three experts to testify to a supposed causal connection between the drug and their children’s … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, US Crime labs | Leave a comment