Category Archives: death penalty

Forensics: The 40 year history of cheating police crime lab “scientists” in the US. No oversight from lab directors. The latest case has CBI chief being allowed to retire. Chilling.

https://denvergazette.com/colorado-watch/drug-laboratory-irregularities-massachusetts-oklahoma/article_edd6fe4a-0069-11f0-8fc1-bf081f5d30ff.html

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, death penalty, DNA profiling, Exoneration costs, Forensic crime lab security issues, forensic science misconduct, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Faked junk bitemark testimony by discredited dentist may lead to first execution in LA since 2010. Governor and AG could care less. Unbelievable.

The legacy of bitemark quackery is horrendous. This dentist has had 7 of his cases overturned on appeal. https://www.propublica.org/article/louisiana-jimmie-duncan-bite-mark-analysis-death-row-junk-science

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, death penalty, Forensic Dentistry, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, police crime labs, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: FAFO. DA and law prof lied, destroyed evidence and she is taking flack from her law students.

https://www.oudaily.com/news/richard-glossip-supreme-court-ruling-ou-college-of-law-professor-prosecutor-connie-smothermon-misconduct-student-petition/article_dc03b832-f85f-11ef-b480-3fe397533ec7.ht

Posted in costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice, death penalty, exoneration, Forensic Science, forensic science misconduct, iCloud criminal investigations, Perjury by Prosecutors, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Do judges and lawyers really care about junk forensics? It leads to false convictions and executions.Texas Supreme Court weighing Robert Roberson case.

Justices are considering whether Roberson must testify before a Texas House committee before the state can carry out his execution. — Read on http://www.wfaa.com/article/news/state/texas-news/how-disagreements-about-texas-death-row-inmates-guilt-became-legal-battle-between-branches-government/287-1b2db227-0453-407f-9b6c-14cc37274f3e

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, death penalty, Exoneration costs, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Incompetent hair analysis led to 8 executions and hundreds of convictions. Virginia Crime Commission recommends deeper review of Mary Jane Burton’s work | VPM

A panel of experts could determine if “pattern of misconduct” occurred. — Read on http://www.vpm.org/news/2024-10-24/mary-jane-burton-admissible-scott-surovell-virginia-dna-testing

Posted in ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, death penalty, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | 2 Comments

Forensics: TX governore Abbott pissed off at junk science commission “interfering” with justice. Death row inmate does not testify before Texas lawmakers despite a subpoena

Robert Roberson was scheduled to be executed last Thursday for the 2002 killing of his 2-year-old daughter Nikki Curtis – who allegedly died from shaken baby syndrome. — Read on http://www.wcvb.com/article/texas-lawmakers-testimony-death-row-inmate-robert-roberson-subpoena/62674022

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, death penalty, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform protecting the innocent, Uncategorized, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Texas’ junk science law is getting another look over Robert Roberson’s case – ABC News

Since its inception in 2013, 74 appeals citing “junk science” have been denied. 1/3 were from death row. All have been denied. A man whose execution was halted will testify at a legislative hearing about a “junk science” law in … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, death penalty, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, Uncategorized, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Junk science kills. Texas’ declines to stop execution in Roberson shaken baby syndrome case | The Week

A Texas man lost his final appeal to avoid execution, based on a conviction his lawyers say is based on debunked junk science. — Read on theweek.com/law/texas-execution-shaken-baby-syndrome

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, costs of wrongful convictions, death penalty, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, human rights violations, junk forensic science, Medical errors, stay of execution | Leave a comment

A Forensic Tragedy: Texas Man Faced Execution Based on Junk Shaken Baby Myth

After Roberson’s conviction, the DA “expert” recanted his opinion that the baby’s death was a homicide. Kudos to Liliana Segura and Jordan Smith for this investigative journalism in The Intercept. The TX AG Paxton refuses to apply the Tx Junk … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice reform, death penalty, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, human rights violations, junk forensic science, stay of execution, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Junk forensics kills. Killer mistakes: Why are exonerations so difficult on death row?

The fact that there are so many roadblocks erected to prevent success in freeing falsely convicted inmates from death row, and that it takes so long to bring about an exoneration, is truly scandalous. — Read on thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/4831550-death-row-exoneration/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Crime, death penalty, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, iCloud criminal investigations, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment