Category Archives: death penalty

Forensics: Do judges and lawyers really care about junk forensics? It leads to false convictions and executions.Texas Supreme Court weighing Robert Roberson case.

Justices are considering whether Roberson must testify before a Texas House committee before the state can carry out his execution. — Read on http://www.wfaa.com/article/news/state/texas-news/how-disagreements-about-texas-death-row-inmates-guilt-became-legal-battle-between-branches-government/287-1b2db227-0453-407f-9b6c-14cc37274f3e

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, death penalty, Exoneration costs, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Incompetent hair analysis led to 8 executions and hundreds of convictions. Virginia Crime Commission recommends deeper review of Mary Jane Burton’s work | VPM

A panel of experts could determine if “pattern of misconduct” occurred. — Read on http://www.vpm.org/news/2024-10-24/mary-jane-burton-admissible-scott-surovell-virginia-dna-testing

Posted in ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, death penalty, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | 2 Comments

Forensics: TX governore Abbott pissed off at junk science commission “interfering” with justice. Death row inmate does not testify before Texas lawmakers despite a subpoena

Robert Roberson was scheduled to be executed last Thursday for the 2002 killing of his 2-year-old daughter Nikki Curtis – who allegedly died from shaken baby syndrome. — Read on http://www.wcvb.com/article/texas-lawmakers-testimony-death-row-inmate-robert-roberson-subpoena/62674022

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, death penalty, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform protecting the innocent, Uncategorized, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Texas’ junk science law is getting another look over Robert Roberson’s case – ABC News

Since its inception in 2013, 74 appeals citing “junk science” have been denied. 1/3 were from death row. All have been denied. A man whose execution was halted will testify at a legislative hearing about a “junk science” law in … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, death penalty, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, Uncategorized, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Junk science kills. Texas’ declines to stop execution in Roberson shaken baby syndrome case | The Week

A Texas man lost his final appeal to avoid execution, based on a conviction his lawyers say is based on debunked junk science. — Read on theweek.com/law/texas-execution-shaken-baby-syndrome

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, costs of wrongful convictions, death penalty, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, human rights violations, junk forensic science, Medical errors, stay of execution | Leave a comment

A Forensic Tragedy: Texas Man Faced Execution Based on Junk Shaken Baby Myth

After Roberson’s conviction, the DA “expert” recanted his opinion that the baby’s death was a homicide. Kudos to Liliana Segura and Jordan Smith for this investigative journalism in The Intercept. The TX AG Paxton refuses to apply the Tx Junk … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice reform, death penalty, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, human rights violations, junk forensic science, stay of execution, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Junk forensics kills. Killer mistakes: Why are exonerations so difficult on death row?

The fact that there are so many roadblocks erected to prevent success in freeing falsely convicted inmates from death row, and that it takes so long to bring about an exoneration, is truly scandalous. — Read on thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/4831550-death-row-exoneration/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Crime, death penalty, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, iCloud criminal investigations, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: How forensic dentists ruin innocent lives

I have co-existed with these dentists for decades. Some are sincere and thoughtful. Others are raging egotists. None are trained as a “scientist .” The outrageous cases like McCrory’s (see the link below) over the last 2 decades have led … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, death penalty, DNA profiling, Exoneration costs, expert testimony, forensic fraud, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform, forensic science reform protecting the innocence, forensic testimony, human rights violations, junk forensic science, missing persons, namus, Ray Krone bitemark case, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: The fight for exoneration: Over 29,100 years ‘lost’ in prison in wrongful convictions, database finds

Over 29,100 years have been ‘lost’ in prison due to wrongful convictions, as Sidney Holmes’ 400-year prison sentence garners attention amid his exoneration. — Read on abcnews.go.com/US/fight-exoneration-29100-years-lost-prison-wrongful-convictions/story

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, death penalty, exoneration, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, Ray Krone bitemark case, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: “Cargo Cult”experts. We Need To Get Junk Science Out of Courtrooms

Forensic pseudoscience introduced into the courtroom has been used to convict and render death on people based on the thinnest of evidence. — Read on http://www.currentaffairs.org/2023/01/we-need-to-get-junk-science-out-of-courtrooms

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, death penalty, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment