Category Archives: Bitemarks

Forensics is not science if negative results are hidden

Excellent presentation on what true science methods really means in regards to reporting studies that fail to support expectations. Hiding “bad” test results is a component of bias present within forensics for decades. For example: bitemarks, bullet lead, hair comparisons, … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, CSI, Forensic Science | Leave a comment

The aftermath of death row exoneration: Milke, Ford, Krone

Ray Krone was convicted to death on bogus forensic science. The expert still refuses to admit any regrets. Read how 3 exonorees have coped with freedom. http://m.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2015/0326/Debra-Milke-Why-freedom-feels-so-elusive-to-death-row-exonerees-video

Posted in Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, exoneration | Leave a comment

BACK to Supreme Court to test new law on forensic ‘science’

A remarkably sad, infuriating  and frustrating ordeal one man in California prison has experienced for 22 years is winding up in intensity. William Richards’ 1997 murder conviction in San Bernardino had been overturned by a habeas corpus hearing in 2010, … Continue reading

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, criminal justice, Forensic Science, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Investigation of forensic science misconduct and deception

Must read. Includes comments from UK expert Professor Iain Pretty. Im still waiting for a response from the US forensic dental group. I think they are in hiding. Thats too bad because they may miss out on some uncoming judicial … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

False forensic bitemark case gets another CA high court look

William Richards’ newest attempt for freedom centers on this application of a new law expecting the judiciary to know something about junk forensic science. http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-bite-mark-court-20150318-story.html

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, exoneration, junk forensic science | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The path forward on bite mark matching — and the rearview mirror #AAFS2015

This is the final article of the Washington Post’s Radley Balko’s 4 part series on forensic science reform and the personalities and organizations (legal advocates and forensic groups) involved on both sides of the discussion. The first three articles are … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bitemarks, criminal justice, exoneration, expert testimony, forensic science reform, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

In depth look at a dangerous forensic ‘science’ #AAFS2015

Third of a four part series on the Washington Post with one more on Friday. This coincides with happenings at the 2015 American Academy of Sciences’ “We are Family” themed convention. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2015/02/18/attack-of-the-bite-mark-matchers-2

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bitemarks, criminal justice, forensic science reform | Leave a comment

The destructive path of bitemark analysis

http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Washington_Post_Series_Examines_Destructive_Path_of_Bite_Mark_Analysis.php

Posted in Bite Marks, Bitemarks, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Last ditch efforts to stay another execution in Texas. Plus a new series from the Washington Post on resistance to forensic reform.

A last minute effort to stay Rodney Reed’s execution in TX is based on new expert review of erroneous Time of Death opinion at the conviction trial. The litigation is led by the Innocence Project. There is a petition to the … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, forensic science misconduct | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Advances in Forensic Fire Science leads to man’s release after 36 years in prison

The article at the end quotes the defense attorney saying “the criminal justice system works.” Thats one side of the coin, and it may be a bit of a stretch, but is not the entire story. It has taken forensic … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, exoneration, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Tagged , , | 1 Comment