The dawn of US forensic science had a few peculiar bedfellows

 

Taking at look at 1904 to the present regarding science and non-science accepted as such. Includes SBS, phrenology, eugenics, gun powder, bullet lead, ear prints, fiber, bitemark and hair matchers. Law professors Saks and Koehler urge that its “time to move outside the courts” for determination of acceptable forensic practices. The Watch

 

===========================================================

Comments from Germany about the inherent bias of crime lab personnel and prosecutors. Includes comments on FBI lab scandal and pattern experts’ subjective opinions.

===========================================================

FBI will now offer DNA testing in cases where their hair analysis people “mis-stated” the reliability and certainty of their methods. This has nothing to do with the unknown number of cases brought forth by FBI trained state and local crime lab persons. 

 

 

 

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, Crime, criminal justice, fingerprints, Forensic Science. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s