Category Archives: Bitemarks

The path forward on bite mark matching — and the rearview mirror #AAFS2015

This is the final article of the Washington Post’s Radley Balko’s 4 part series on forensic science reform and the personalities and organizations (legal advocates and forensic groups) involved on both sides of the discussion. The first three articles are … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bitemarks, criminal justice, exoneration, expert testimony, forensic science reform, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

In depth look at a dangerous forensic ‘science’ #AAFS2015

Third of a four part series on the Washington Post with one more on Friday. This coincides with happenings at the 2015 American Academy of Sciences’ “We are Family” themed convention. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2015/02/18/attack-of-the-bite-mark-matchers-2

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bitemarks, criminal justice, forensic science reform | Leave a comment

The destructive path of bitemark analysis

http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Washington_Post_Series_Examines_Destructive_Path_of_Bite_Mark_Analysis.php

Posted in Bite Marks, Bitemarks, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Last ditch efforts to stay another execution in Texas. Plus a new series from the Washington Post on resistance to forensic reform.

A last minute effort to stay Rodney Reed’s execution in TX is based on new expert review of erroneous Time of Death opinion at the conviction trial. The litigation is led by the Innocence Project. There is a petition to the … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, forensic science misconduct | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Advances in Forensic Fire Science leads to man’s release after 36 years in prison

The article at the end quotes the defense attorney saying “the criminal justice system works.” Thats one side of the coin, and it may be a bit of a stretch, but is not the entire story. It has taken forensic … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, exoneration, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Junk Forensic Science Shows Up at the 2015 American Academy of Forensic Sciences Meeting – Again

Forensic science fails in specific controversial areas of wherein “classic” investigation methods, never brought forth by the scientific method, are still posing as “business as usual.”. Think of the “matches” you hear about on TV.  Ignore DNA and Toxicology. This is … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, Forensic Science, forensic science reform, junk forensic science, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

New strategy in exoneration litigation: The Nullification of Innocence

Nothing is ever over in exoneration litigation, be it from exonerees’ difficulties in re-entering society, or when some DAs and police, with help from their lawyers, continue to chase after the men and women who have wrongfully endured imprisonment from … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bitemarks, criminal justice, Exoneration costs, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Nasty World of forensic dentistry bitemark opinions – Forensic News from the US

The Nasty world of bitemark opinions. At least five cases of forensic lab misconduct in the last 2 years. Some ballistics and trace exams discontinued as “too time consuming.” Most trace is merely associative  (not identifying a specific person or … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, Forensic Science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

DNA versus ABFO bitemark opinion and the FBI CODIS gaff denies chance to find the real murderer

Click picture for Gerard’s post exoneration video The NY Innocence Projects’s fight to identify a murderer is blocked by a ridiculous FBI rule about “lawyer lab certification.” All this started with another wrongful conviction ( N=1480 at the National Registry … Continue reading

Posted in ABFO, Bitemarks, criminal justice, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Forensic science review : 40 years of assuming “unique dental profiling” now considered unproven – AGAIN

The vagaries of what is “science” is a topic of interest to historians and those in the science business as part of their training. “Scientific advance” is what is expected to be the outcome. An odd variant is when some … Continue reading

Posted in Bitemarks, criminal justice, forensic science reform, Ray Krone bitemark case, Wrongful Conviction | Tagged , | Leave a comment