Category Archives: Bitemarks

Forensic pathology: When doggies bite, who did it? đź§Ş

Forensic pathology: When doggies bite, who did it? đź§Ş https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825000301

Posted in AAFS, Bitemarks, forensic pathology | Leave a comment

Forensics: Welcome to the world of justice delayed and wrongful convictions. Forensic science failures persist as labs fail to adopt standards

Forensic science has deadly stakes, but half of the largest labs in the U.S. haven’t adopted federal standards, including for DNA tests and guns. — Read on http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/11/18/forensic-science-crime-lab-police-dna-test/75823347007/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, Exoneration costs, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics Tell this to the bitemark supporters in the US Department of Justice and the #AAFS. The Law Must Respond when Science Changes | Scientific American

The first org only hires bitemarkers of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. What was once fair under the law may become unfair when science changes. The law must react to uphold due process — Read on http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-law-must-respond-when-science-changes/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensics: Incompetent hair analysis led to 8 executions and hundreds of convictions. Virginia Crime Commission recommends deeper review of Mary Jane Burton’s work | VPM

A panel of experts could determine if “pattern of misconduct” occurred. — Read on http://www.vpm.org/news/2024-10-24/mary-jane-burton-admissible-scott-surovell-virginia-dna-testing

Posted in ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, death penalty, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | 2 Comments

Forensics: More worthless studies on gender IDs from lip prints and tongue shapes. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

My critiques of bitemarks and similar pseudoscience practitioners got me banned from LinkedIn, the editorial board of the J of Forensics Sciences, and working for the US Department of Justice. How’s that for the “cancel culture” inside forensic science? My … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Migrant minors wrongly sent to adult detention due to scam X-rays.

The misuse of dental and medical “science” for police purposes in the US. Civil rights groups file a complaint for federal agencies to disclose info about discredited scientific methods used to determine minors’ age — Read on prismreports.org/2024/10/02/migrant-minors-sent-to-adult-detention/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, human identification, human rights violations | 1 Comment

Forensics: When science is overwhelmed by cult believers pushing their beliefs. Read about bitemark matching in East Indian “crime fighting” dentists.

ijetv.org/index.php/IJETV/article/download/1180/766

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Crime lab scandal, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform protecting the innocent, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: More Bitemark BS From the Indian Subcontinent. Also Includes Other Dental Junk Methods.

Welcome to the world of pseudo-forensics. The entire body of the Indian forensic dental community is a circle of self affirming statements praising their skills. The entire 72 pages of this literature review has no citations. Its references are skewed … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, Medical errors | Leave a comment

Junk forensics kills. Killer mistakes: Why are exonerations so difficult on death row?

The fact that there are so many roadblocks erected to prevent success in freeing falsely convicted inmates from death row, and that it takes so long to bring about an exoneration, is truly scandalous. — Read on thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/4831550-death-row-exoneration/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Crime, death penalty, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, iCloud criminal investigations, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Typical whitewash of junk bitemarker myth. In PubMed! They now buddy up with DNA. Integration of Bite Mark Microbiome Analysis with Forensic DNA Profiling: Advancements, Challenges, and Synergistic Approaches – PubMed

Bite mark analysis plays a pivotal role in forensic investigations, by helping to identify suspects and establish links between individuals and crime scenes. However, traditional bite mark methodologies face significant challenges due to issues with reliability and subjectivity. Recent advances … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment