Monthly Archives: October 2024

Forensics: Medical neglience associated with TX politicians.

http://www.threads.net/@ajvictorymd/post/DBv-hBkOLSg

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, Crime, criminal justice, forensic science reform protecting the innocent, Medical errors, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forensics: Are police actual ‘drug experts’ ? It’s junk science.’ Michigan court case sets precedent for so-called drug ‘experts’

‘It’s junk science.’ Michigan court case sets precedent for so-called drug ‘experts’ – mlive.com — Read on http://www.mlive.com/news/2024/10/its-junk-science-michigan-court-case-sets-precedent-for-so-called-drug-experts.html

Posted in costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, Forensic Science, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Low genetic diversity in DNA samples leads to false positives. DNA analysis is less accurate for some people, new University of Oregon study finds

A University of Oregon study found DNA analysis can be less accurate for some groups of people, which can incorrectly link them to a crime. — Read on http://www.koin.com/news/oregon/forensic-dna-analysis-is-less-accurate-for-some-people-university-of-oregon-study-finds/

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, DNA mixtures, DNA profiling, forensic evidence exaggeration, Uncategorized, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Legal bullet expert doubts state’s bullet evidence against Richard Allen. Tech did not record negative results and did not test multiple weapons taken from double murder crime scene.

CARROLL COUNTY, Ind. — The only piece of hard evidence presented before jurors in the Richard Allen double murder trial in Delphi that supposedly directly ties the defendant to the killings of Abby Williams and Libby German in 2017 is … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, forensic testimony, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Incompetent hair analysis led to 8 executions and hundreds of convictions. Virginia Crime Commission recommends deeper review of Mary Jane Burton’s work | VPM

A panel of experts could determine if “pattern of misconduct” occurred. — Read on http://www.vpm.org/news/2024-10-24/mary-jane-burton-admissible-scott-surovell-virginia-dna-testing

Posted in ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, death penalty, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | 2 Comments

Forensics: TX governore Abbott pissed off at junk science commission “interfering” with justice. Death row inmate does not testify before Texas lawmakers despite a subpoena

Robert Roberson was scheduled to be executed last Thursday for the 2002 killing of his 2-year-old daughter Nikki Curtis – who allegedly died from shaken baby syndrome. — Read on http://www.wcvb.com/article/texas-lawmakers-testimony-death-row-inmate-robert-roberson-subpoena/62674022

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, death penalty, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform protecting the innocent, Uncategorized, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: More worthless studies on gender IDs from lip prints and tongue shapes. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

My critiques of bitemarks and similar pseudoscience practitioners got me banned from LinkedIn, the editorial board of the J of Forensics Sciences, and working for the US Department of Justice. How’s that for the “cancel culture” inside forensic science? My … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Texas’ junk science law is getting another look over Robert Roberson’s case – ABC News

Since its inception in 2013, 74 appeals citing “junk science” have been denied. 1/3 were from death row. All have been denied. A man whose execution was halted will testify at a legislative hearing about a “junk science” law in … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, death penalty, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, Uncategorized, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: ‘Shaken baby” myth condemned him. Texas junk science law reason for temporary stay in death row execution

Robert Roberson, the first person scheduled to be executed over “shaken baby syndrome” in the death of his daughter, won a stay of execution in Texas. — Read on http://www.newsnationnow.com/cuomo-show/texas-junk-science-law-reason-for-temporary-stay-of-execution/

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, expert testimony, Forensic Science Bias, human rights violations, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Looking for a different perp. Judge rules Scott Peterson’s defense team can review some old evidence, including DNA evidence – ABC7 New York

A judge has granted Scott Peterson’s legal team access to some of the evidence in the murder case against him, which includes DNA evidence. — Read on abc7ny.com/post/judge-rules-scott-peterson-defense-team-can-review-old-evidence/15409571/

Posted in Crime, Forensic Science, police crime labs | Leave a comment