From the great state of Orange County, California.
https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/article237862684.html
From the great state of Orange County, California.
https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/article237862684.html
One major issue in the fingerprinting world is how court testimony of these experts can mislead juries to expect mis-matches never occur.
Fingerprint Analysis Is High-Stakes Work — but It Doesn’t Take Much to Qualify as an Expert
Any assumption that a DNA mixture can prove who was and wasn’t the perp gets clobbered in this study. Some people shed (i.e. leave) DNA more than others.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1872497319301164
Every dentist who has testified on the age of skin injuries from their color should contact the Innocence Project to initiate review of their unreliable opinion. Justice demands the advances of science should influence all these cases from the last 60 years.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073819304104
Dana Delger ’10 works as a strategic litigator for the Innocence Project and fights against using flawed forensic evidence, like bite marks, in criminal cases.
— Read on www.law.columbia.edu/news/2019/11/dana-delger-fights-to-keep-flawed-forensics-from-convicting-the-innocent
These lawyers know how to talk science. No wonder the crime labbers and prosecutors hate it when they show in their courtrooms.
Heavily shedding criminals, beware
— Read on www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/11/scientists-can-now-identify-someone-single-strand-hair
Let’s see if prosecutors and the judiciary get the gumption and honesty to see this as the death knell for bitemark flim flam. Congrats to the Scots and Open Access publishing!
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00414-019-02163-5
…..and the police want to do their DNA rapid and inhouse. Yikes.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/03/business/drunk-driving-breathalyzer.html