Category Archives: forensic evidence exaggeration

Forensics: Despite USDOJ claim of ballistics “quasi-science,”Auditor to review DC ballistic crime lab’s compliance with 2011 law creating independent forensic agency

The troubled D.C. crime lab is getting another probing: This time by the Office of the D.C. Auditor. — Read on wtop.com/dc/2021/08/auditor-to-review-dc-crime-labs-compliance-with-2011-law-creating-independent-forensic-agency/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct, US Crime labs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Unknown DOJ Prosecutor writes policy statement ignoring scientific commissions’ years of critical review.

Another hit piece by government lawyers claiming scientific scrutiny of police science is unscientific. Weird. Democracy Forward and the Union of Concerned Scientists say the Trump-era statement is biased, inaccurate, and runs afoul of federal law. — Read on theintercept.com/2021/08/08/forensic-science-reform-justice-department/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science reform, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Opinion | Why we can’t trust the states to prevent wrongful convictions – The Washington Post

Reformist prosecutors are showing how the system’s preference for “finality” thwarts the interests of justice. — Read on http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/08/09/why-we-cant-trust-states-prevent-wrongful-convictions/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, forensic evidence exaggeration, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: US Courts and Prosecutors recent history of resisting forensic reforms.

http://www.law360.com/articles/1261492/why-courts-still-lag-behind-on-forensic-science

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, CSI, forensic evidence exaggeration, US Crime labs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Junk science gets support from DOJ Statement Pushing Dubious Forensic Science Is Challenged by Advocates

Democracy Forward and the Union of Concerned Scientists say the Trump-era statement is biased, inaccurate, and runs afoul of federal law. — Read on theintercept.com/2021/08/08/forensic-science-reform-justice-department/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform, wrongful convictions | Tagged | 2 Comments

Forensics: Demands for changing ‘The Entrenched Carceralism of Forensics.’ Weak judges, need for better science oversight.

The forensic system has deep structural flaws that may be beyond reform. It may be time to radically reimagine it. — Read on inquest.org/entrenched-carceralism-of-forensics/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, prosecutorial misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensics: A story of botched forensics and malicious prosecution. Free Keith Davis Jr.

This is not uncommon. A DA hoping for a plea deal contining to recharge despite numerous failures. This is the story of Keith Davis Jr. This story could be any one of our stories. — Read on keithdavisjr.com/

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensic examination: Unhappy bitemarkers in OZ. The case for a criminal review commission in Australia

Uneasy about improper use of their discipline, forensics experts call for an appeals body to protect against miscarriages of justice — Read on http://www.theguardian.com/law/2021/jul/18/forensic-examination-the-case-for-a-criminal-review-commission-in-australia

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science reform, junk forensic science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Low proficiency experts’ juror effects explored. Insights: Juror Appraisals of Forensic Science Evidence – @CSAFE

Insights: Juror Appraisals of Forensic Science Evidence – Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence — Read on forensicstats.org/blog/2020/10/10/insights-juror-appraisals-of-forensic-science-evidence/

Posted in AAFS, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Commission refers the 1998 murder conviction of Justin Plummer to the Court of Appeal due to bitemark expert

Its a prime example of a dentist testimony exceeding the limits of scientific knowledge. These guys are always “very convincing.” Commission refers the murder conviction of Justin Plummer to the Court of Appeal | Criminal Cases Review Commission — Read … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment