Category Archives: Bad Forensic Science

Forensics: Finally. Appeals court agrees shaken baby syndrome is ‘junk science’ in some cases

A New Jersey appellate court sided with two fathers accused of child abuse who argued the science behind shaken baby syndrome isn’t sound. — Read on newjerseymonitor.com/2023/09/13/appeals-court-agrees-shaken-baby-syndrome-is-junk-science-in-some-cases/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, forensic science misconduct | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics fraud eradicator. Law Review focuses on regulating junk forensics (i.e bitemarks) by applying ABA ethical rule 3.8 violations onto prosecutors.

scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, William Richards Exoneration Case | Leave a comment

Forensics: Junk toolmark “ID.”Interview: Innocence Project attorney representing the Grand Junction pipe bombing case talks junk science and wrongful convictions

Chris Fabricant is among the attorneys representing James Genrich, a man who was convicted in a series of pipe bombings in the 1990s. — Read on http://www.cpr.org/2023/09/11/innocence-project-grand-junction-pipe-bombing-case-wrongful-convictions/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, expert testimony, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: DAs seldom get punished for misconduct. Wrongful Convictions Cost Chicago Taxpayers $153M from 2019 to 2023: Analysis | Chicago News

That toll is set to grow in the coming weeks, as the Chicago City Council considers paying $25 million to resolve separate lawsuits filed in 2016 by two men who spent a combined 34 years in prison after being wrongly … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Alabama’s History of Botched Executions. Say Hello to AG Stevie Marshall

Forensics: Bumbling Alabama AG Stevie Marshall’s history of tortuous executions. huffpost.com/entry/alabama-…

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, human rights violations | Leave a comment

Forensics: Civil Judges get it. But criminal courts still allow bitemarks. Junk Science in the Courtroom Keeps Coming Back – and Getting Swatted

There’s something about autism that invites scapegoating. The latest attack was on makers of Lexapro, the anti-depressant medication, when used during pregnancy. Six plaintiffs recruited three experts to testify to a supposed causal connection between the drug and their children’s … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, US Crime labs | Leave a comment

Forensics: Anthro BS from the 19th century into the 20th. The skull maps that quantified racism

These maps — of geographical differences in skull shapes — have vanished from acceptable science (and cartography). — Read on bigthink.com/strange-maps/cephalic-index-maps/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Wrongful conviction: Rosa Jimenez exonerated in Austin child’s death due to paper towel ingestion

In the years after Jimenez was wrongfully found guilty, medical evidence and testimony that led to her 2005 conviction was found to be false. — Read on http://www.statesman.com/story/news/2023/08/07/wrongful-conviction-rosa-jimenez-exonerated-in-austin-childs-death/70541801007/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, Forensic Science Bias, Medical errors | Leave a comment

Forensis: Excellent Review. THE CHALLENGES TO THE FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN BITE MARKS IN SKIN Etc.

Conclusions reveal why bm opinions are invalid. Skin distortion and cognitive biases are paramount. Great literature review. View of THE CHALLENGES TO THE FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN BITE MARKS IN SKIN AND COMPARISON WITH TEETH — Read on esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/4142/99193547137

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, open access forensic information, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Confused legal thinking as Judge thinks junk evidence testimony insufficient for actual innocence claim. Father denied wrongful conviction compensation in 1998 ‘shaken baby’ case.

https://thedailyrecord.com/2023/08/02/father-denied-wrongful-conviction-compensation-in-1998-shaken-baby-case/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, junk forensic science | Leave a comment